Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)

Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 21 May 2020 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089933A0B71 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 02:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdfjpupYE5VD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 02:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1523A0B72 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 02:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jbhnu-0008IB-Es for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:47:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 09:47:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jbhnu-0008IB-Es@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1jbhnt-0008HK-55 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:47:53 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1jbhnq-0001iZ-LG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:47:53 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C883A0B6D; Thu, 21 May 2020 02:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, mnot@mnot.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.0.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <159005445899.23374.13670236118157078353@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 02:47:39 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=noreply@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1jbhnq-0001iZ-LG ef4ac9a9753b5e55acda85aa5f29c9db
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/159005445899.23374.13670236118157078353@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37702
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have no significant concern here, but I would appreciate an answer if I
understand the situation correctly.

The Accept-CH header value is  structure header value and uses sh-token which
has a more restrictive syntax than the HTTP specifications token used for
header field names. However, this restriction is not of any real practical
concern as all registered HTTP headers starts with an ALPHA. I did notice that
the new HTTP semantics documents proposed new registry was not mandating but
strongly recommending to keep within what sh-token can except. Thus, do I
assume correctly that this issue has been sufficiently discussed in the WG?