IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Questions about stream state transitions

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ED011E818E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IKtXbbdxISLj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6E011E8193 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UzrDm-0002gz-VM for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:38:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:38:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UzrDm-0002gz-VM@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UzrDe-0002em-RP for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:38:18 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UzrDc-0000jq-TT for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:38:18 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q56so3155063wes.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pnHyC4xxwjazX9tXTwYZEMG4YwfkQs9TRyYkpyXQzrY=; b=tX4IrXNJMMN2QmxSLNUKp0AJbxkQvOnTK/fgA4vnaCabua/5P1ndMQnMLeNf2CEaQR eB9JSSW9egJHQLSlK2MAvDyaqtIDdoRpi988BDYt51zU8yFuCPt6F3cQQuSu0IgjJScP 9zS1iCpiZ5X4UIWGVzbo6zn/rhwkk20G6CmH061+FqLt3HUErbMGjCSdvv3TRcC+gU2H of0RQ9QrhYYbvBskLGU0Z/AaPEdJgnBoFmBKJPgIP1XenquQaXscCRY2PBWDz7eic4bG jwNWXyKIPd2BbZUMszyf7T6E06XLRBExC8sz4eSTMmDMG/lU/5WaZZxZWKk/XUAOWsXs olcg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.9.212 with SMTP id c20mr19818020wib.65.1374165470814; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51E7A83A.2050209@iij.ad.jp>
References: <51E6908F.2010602@iij.ad.jp> <CABkgnnVRuSRwr+3RQd=5+nMcz5Mhy3mavSXc15wi_0ZFd5yo8g@mail.gmail.com> <51E78D77.7060000@iij.ad.jp> <20130718080838.GA880@LK-Perkele-VII> <51E7A83A.2050209@iij.ad.jp>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:37:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUfM-U1UZ9FV99ZLzhc3D8F652wsBE5Ctcw+rOmaH0iFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.172; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f172.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.684, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UzrDc-0000jq-TT 2164ebeaf3ce5911fc1d2d1e04184343
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Questions about stream state transitions
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnUfM-U1UZ9FV99ZLzhc3D8F652wsBE5Ctcw+rOmaH0iFg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18845
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 18 July 2013 01:32, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp> wrote:
>> Also, I think that anytime DATA can be successfully received,
>> WINDOW_UPDATE can be sent (half closed (local) seems to violate
>> that).
>
>
> PRIORITY can also be received in reserved(local/remote) accrding to the
> above model.

No this is also incorrect in the table.  If you can receive DATA, then
the protocol requires that you be able to send WINDOW_UPDATE.

Another bug I noticed is that it should be possible to send
PUSH_PROMISE in half closed (remote) and to receive it in half closed
(local).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email