IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 02 April 2015 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7E41B2AD8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7iws5Qxc3R8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B5961B2AD7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YdXHe-0003po-QQ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:03:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:03:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YdXHe-0003po-QQ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YdXHb-0003p3-3Q for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:03:11 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YdXHZ-0006uC-VQ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:03:11 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C509A22E25F; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 01:02:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NEwNWkJzuO4PtVGEsUko5H8s=tWpT-1Xib7ZzaejO0kfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 16:02:42 +1100
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com>, HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C9955894-ADC9-42AA-91A7-0FF2FEB4DA2F@mnot.net>
References: <4AC59768-2519-4B95-86F3-43C19B4329E7@mnot.net> <D24E0668-56B7-4457-8E7C-DF7623AEF77B@mnot.net> <CABb0SYS+kTiCKHQUWfnVWV-DKfY6TVWm81UT1BE7xHAtg42E7g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXmtyt+r8Q-cJp2M+e8jnBc888pDXs6kd7N6bE-E1b2WQ@mail.gmail.com> <21C94472-23EE-4133-B4B5-7F772490E432@mnot.net> <CAH_y2NEwNWkJzuO4PtVGEsUko5H8s=tWpT-1Xib7ZzaejO0kfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.200, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YdXHZ-0006uC-VQ 29e0b7b8475a784ed673a9e3371ec789
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/C9955894-ADC9-42AA-91A7-0FF2FEB4DA2F@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29213
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 2 Apr 2015, at 1:53 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
> 
> Mark,
> 
> Do we also list h2c and h2c-14 etc. ?

Of course.

> Also, I couldn't help my OC self and sorted the table.

You are forgiven :)

> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2 April 2015 at 13:26, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Right.
> 
> The most common values will be “h2” and “h2-14” (because 14 is the last implementation draft we nominated, and is what most implementations use today AFAICT).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> > On 2 Apr 2015, at 1:15 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 1 April 2015 at 18:58, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is draft 17 the final? I never found an actual finalized RFC.
> >
> > The RFC editor is working on -17.  There will be no technical changes
> > between that and the final document.
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>  @  Webtide - an Intalio subsidiary
> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
> http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status