Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 10 January 2016 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A9F1ACE3B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:23:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fV32O88pTRtV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00E251ACE3A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aIJfc-0007ca-Ug for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:20:48 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:20:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aIJfc-0007ca-Ug@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <barryleiba@gmail.com>) id 1aIJfY-0007bt-Fi for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:20:44 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com ([209.85.213.178]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <barryleiba@gmail.com>) id 1aIJfW-0004Zq-I3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:20:43 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ik10so109083172igb.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:20:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Eb3h2Z3bpyRp4bmVOwzH/Ht8tqKgaIf5jGxIy8dbH2s=; b=uLOMjwC+tiknGnDEqh+IKM4aPA8kN9cUHPpnzk40AltbgQ12nh96UZabQQollNNTnu MKbIIr8SvEPc8G0ME9Radldx8gnpgKLGezrx0nGe7eohBaj4wHYKwgIXYX2NL/zy/eVU 8+QTDyZUmYa5BwyGgASOk6tAa8GG5KHitrDVFhfsqcrwvA3reBPTzmpeiojTlAXCaBL3 wLvpkhfd7LTaup1PxLJ4Dxj2K3dNZMmXHdti1F0JRLXxLQZsPU4S+q54SMK+stCz+Bu9 foRWx2xYgWlLmNKYXHlUlswPDIxCFKCoXVgh+qdmV0sj/0XeFvvf7j2JYfduATrBeH8q NgQA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.138.72 with SMTP id qo8mr8232585igb.81.1452446416417; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.36.117.83 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:20:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56927D52.2000106@gmx.de>
References: <CALaySJK5fYy_JCv0Y7Fs3QpPk95fUxyt272JMc-QUpVKO7_gJA@mail.gmail.com> <56853BCC.7030005@gmx.de> <56927D52.2000106@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:20:16 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DvFqJmE0hyF-1BLvVHZ-hIq_D0Y
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+mVOHinmehK2jm3jQaEkXJZ2BRbaY4a5wuw=eOOO-A9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.213.178; envelope-from=barryleiba@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.888, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aIJfW-0004Zq-I3 df08c67345f351fb8d7a2ba9d20a3147
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CALaySJ+mVOHinmehK2jm3jQaEkXJZ2BRbaY4a5wuw=eOOO-A9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30877
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

>>> I don't think this is a 2119 "MAY": what *else* can it do?  You have no
>>> other guidance about which alternative alternative to pick, so....  I
>>> think this should just say, "it chooses the most suitable...."
>>
>> Agreed. I haven't changed that yet as it affects normative language but
>> I will unless somebody wants to defend it soonish.
>
> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/a9df1e33703a2cb46c9b441bfca5bbc04fff80d1>

Nice.  Is this the last of the updates, or are we still working on
any?  Whenever you're ready to post a new I-D version, I'll give it a
check and request last call.

Barry