IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: trailers and pseudo-headers

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 02 July 2014 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9C91A0097 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 05:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1vKwwdk5Ug1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 05:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B44C81A008D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 05:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1X2Jbw-0001hU-0o for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:26:04 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:26:04 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1X2Jbw-0001hU-0o@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1X2Jbj-0001Y3-Vo for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:25:52 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1X2Jbi-0004lh-Gf for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:25:51 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.106] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfVzj-1XGnHa3m2t-00P76H; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:25:18 +0200
Message-ID: <53B3FA28.7000002@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:25:12 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
CC: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <53B3A631.80907@gmx.de> <0A3A3665-FEBD-467D-857A-6D1E61C83056@mnot.net> <53B3AD3A.8020307@gmx.de> <19984.1404286540@critter.freebsd.dk> <53B3B835.80807@gmx.de> <E6C630F0-92C4-4B42-8133-7C2D7745440B@apple.com> <53B3F54D.6070009@gmx.de> <21751.1404302966@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <21751.1404302966@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:BOMscyrzA0aRLevmNVLY5FIyry1Hx4zp1zqHB3dZxeDkT5gEtZS K9pesS+jLAwx9ghEpGWKMv4QICDGdU2GxKAGbhAun/2JbXf9hAJc5076zweyVGLcEXQiCzD dafsyg9W8AYJ5KBGDFQr+tilgTvZ6uCOnnUY/PPtyryqo8adNbPdzPQQJr4qxJP3IPtOoq0 hac9yuo7MYZmev/P7cstQ==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.433, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1X2Jbi-0004lh-Gf 40a1f2b2858da45186496a75db4e478b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: trailers and pseudo-headers
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/53B3FA28.7000002@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/25134
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2014-07-02 14:09, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <53B3F54D.6070009@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>
>> There are many cases where a server would say "200", and then start a
>> complicated process that might fail half-way. In HTTP/1.1, signalling an
>> error in this situation is hard (abort the chunked transfer or close the
>> connection). It would be good if HTTP/2 can do better here.
>
> I thought that was what RST_STREAM was for ?

Well, yes, we can say "something went wrong", but that's all.

Best regards, Julian

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status