IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 11 January 2016 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8CA1A90E1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:41:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K3nCh28vkx4P for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D521A90A8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aIm0x-00077G-94 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:36:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:36:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aIm0x-00077G-94@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aIm0u-00076T-5u for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:36:40 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1aIm0s-0004wy-T9 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:36:39 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z14so113058715igp.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:36:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Wa4vVq36AYF3cDQo8Kyg5lAr6e+IYSTNWvKuAWX6UWM=; b=tf5nEXUeAawHZWV7PUrvVMfl/ZFMo4QZ6NblS8vBOiQZLogBlbFajftKS+LEi6c2Nd ut1pAExCnkrXSRWfTqxXLKcaFD96uxpEWa22+wsV+9EN+ehVaBGGAFWyER2DHt2zoXhp 3w5rkcsE3Mww2rjA6BHq6I5AkJr38iBV3E4qvGAOYvF5H5eG3fXK5vVtTYOjPKRyriPk k1VPE4FuP0VxAyMr00VFD2d7hOON8ZQv9HGoma/cSTsugtRH7kfNn8QNu24aXrELePGB fyLZJbtGExNBNp5RAWK5xt1nEPfUSClGkv7EmkJ+j26Gx4Evo3A7h9gMatK3GZ1mYoZ3 O1/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.60.6 with SMTP id d6mr15552232igr.94.1452555373025; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.149.130 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:36:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANatvzxPMBPyUy6gw8izBxev5H_ShVKM-WEyaPEnkLWB9Y6F0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANatvzyLsrbY4d1Vnq3tSSvt_Tf44sYx0gM-dAWw4d97pz3Mgw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXns4ZUHG032x=d-UPYpbT=Y4DSsL0OzqT3TUD2h_d5Bg@mail.gmail.com> <CANatvzxPMBPyUy6gw8izBxev5H_ShVKM-WEyaPEnkLWB9Y6F0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:36:12 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWReTh_73WX0aYvMoHJcG9YWq9doyCiT_JGVokURQDkOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.213.182; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f182.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.837, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aIm0s-0004wy-T9 714141f5620b689f6f9799d1e883c6ea
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Submitted new I-D: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWReTh_73WX0aYvMoHJcG9YWq9doyCiT_JGVokURQDkOA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30888
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 9 January 2016 at 17:45, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> wrote:
> Considering the fact that there are specific requirements to cache
> digests for optimizing HTTP/2 push (i.e. the digest should be small /
> the digest may be sent before the first HTTP/2 frame arrives from the
> server), I think it would be appropriate to keep the description of
> the primary use case.


I definitely agree.  We understand this use case, and it doesn't make
sense to solve problems we don't understand well.  Let's at least make
sure that it works for one use case :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email