Re: Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when does the client need to return them?
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 27 April 2013 03:08 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E2921F9A06 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.691, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQjFua3IoEiZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A9B21F9D77 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UVvTI-0003DK-0q for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:06:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:06:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UVvTI-0003DK-0q@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UVvTC-0003Ca-6E for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:06:38 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UVvTB-0003mc-L0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:06:38 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s10so3957295wey.21 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=L/1MBZxBdljmbCWsm9vW9sbFz1/aMAFikEBVJS3j44s=; b=EMdzcwOrbLk3BIYeyo6hO1fMBODn33aDbBvNKQNWU4gkgKtGW41ZlcKPOWuGuY6SNz eRJKRfXIRee9pt0mCHu1B55dCduvTjc68ca1eji4kzhg8Nnk6UmwRhGgBhZrUb2n9VU7 n3K3yQAvVx21Y7aMMzZPIVWlwYq22wqIxf3s6+tjXkxH4/nVkEanPyVGlqW/u2CcntuL gUOV79mOHNk87OEtstDHNQW5oJwIcgN+ph88mEvm1CMaOVaoUWAXAfs9J74dswh7JrgA Kak4dFJ8i4pk4vlMCEtIFTZSBGbCXN63M/bnDwrVWppEZiXrLhV5CQgWOmPZZi08ldgZ qXZg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.236.169 with SMTP id uv9mr4526866wjc.42.1367031971118; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7Rbcyf2FQH50OC1EgTr5+So_4tisVNZKOUBvKDe=fRgMbxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7Rbcyf2FQH50OC1EgTr5+So_4tisVNZKOUBvKDe=fRgMbxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:06:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXc2aw43aXMDM7oXoDcgDs3+03qwYfw6Sobz_tbMh_diA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.176; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f176.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.632, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UVvTB-0003mc-L0 aecb4e5f0003a2c724aa562dce0b0f3b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when does the client need to return them?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXc2aw43aXMDM7oXoDcgDs3+03qwYfw6Sobz_tbMh_diA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17629
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Given that persisted settings are at risk, I think that we can defer addressing this one. (I'd say that once is enough and that persisted settings need only be returned at connection establishment time, but that's not the only thing we need to address with persistent settings, I think.) On 26 April 2013 14:28, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > One bit that's not clear in the current draft... > > When the server asks the client to persist a setting, is the client > required to return that setting in EVERY subsequent SETTINGS frame it > sends to the server until the setting is cleared or is it only > required to send the persisted settings once when a new session is > established (i.e. in the client session header?) >
- Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when does … James M Snell
- Re: Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when d… Martin Thomson
- Re: Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when d… James M Snell
- Re: Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when d… Roberto Peon
- Re: Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when d… James M Snell
- Re: Editorial Issue: Persisted Settings... when d… William Chan (陈智昌)