Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 03 March 2015 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38D61A1AC6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 01:01:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6jwz220Jx_GN for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 01:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F4111A1AC2 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 01:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YSidx-0001Pd-3y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 08:57:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 08:57:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YSidx-0001Pd-3y@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YSidk-0001Or-62 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 08:57:20 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YSidi-0001rd-R9 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 08:57:20 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.177] ([93.217.112.38]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1SLt-1XdvKD3eTx-00tVxC; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:56:42 +0100
Message-ID: <54F5773E.5080909@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:56:30 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <2ACFD2A2-D620-4409-BB2E-D7F8C88CB26C@mnot.net> <54F556C2.3080003@gmx.de> <54F55C40.7030503@treenet.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <54F55C40.7030503@treenet.co.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:wdzy4P5wzaVEGyp53HXzGjKWKeV5rlRyQpkd2wgEmOxYLgu78fC tdtnvxXwnTYWU2+IEjLMQcq9FWhuU3VgVVrWnfTtoFTQiUuBFnYg/jVO6ZaqnCBBjY/5rK/ lQWtSlEMYOmIWTUECpwyM9t73vBzTA5Z4A1KVJIwnRTb9441RlhIzxx0/frBjY4nxbgIqHa 4AcCz49rwt919qwAu349w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.371, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YSidi-0001rd-R9 d1ddc02a5b34dd4c060b6f949cab134e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54F5773E.5080909@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28879
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 2015-03-03 08:01, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 3/03/2015 7:37 p.m., Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2015-03-03 03:49, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> Julian has disposed of all of the issues raised during WGLC, and >>> there's only one editorial issue left (regarding RFC2119 language). >> >> The ones I added in github. Amos, are you ok with the changes I made? > > In the new text for section 4 copied from RFC7235: > > " > Hence, in such a configuration, it will appear as if > Proxy-Authentication-Info is being forwarded because each proxy will > send the same challenge set. > " > > I'm not sure if "challenge set" is the right words there since this is a > response header and challenge is request detail. > Perhapse "header field-value" instead? > > Overall it looks good to me, even with the above. > > Amos Good catch: <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/b1cfbee4c65805839f32e0477848e1f8791cfcad>
- draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Mark Nottingham
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Julian Reschke
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Amos Jeffries
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Julian Reschke
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Julian Reschke