Re: Who is using experimental codepoints in HTTP/2?

Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> Tue, 25 May 2021 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CF83A166D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkkjosHjkw4s for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1670D3A166A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1llQK4-0003CM-Pc for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:13:48 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 06:13:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1llQK4-0003CM-Pc@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1llQJs-0003AW-VG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:13:37 +0000
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1llQJr-0004gR-0F for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:13:36 +0000
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id q7so42891192lfr.6 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Zt1Eb8qI6AqZM3NWT4qcikdc+ZA3R9g/R0bhDhw0/IE=; b=UwRSTNhJ7GejCRbSYYtsph5bWf9CC90A+ZRRztiIxBWmIpc8DMpPRzgbxMlcOkaGNH dhYWgk6luS3Dlyl34ydJvzi2Rh7dNI5lx6NLIuYS0AfRJvmJr7yownQpA6pP3Iuqt1QI +iU7dgOLn2vgo2fkGqLKPlwdAxB4BAzYZm0SXNVJEFA83iSYtmchWvA+DDVzEB8ykgZS nHkYWCoVwq5sVPRCY3OugAtf0QBvWCop8O8uvqFlnnP2Id1ElG4mjad3hjJMq92RmvQ2 N+VcW59Mq/cItBhNtdLw7Fdt4LnOl5fFQyi0iQP68N6GQlrq4zo7pZdTFcTIC52wtnHV msNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Zt1Eb8qI6AqZM3NWT4qcikdc+ZA3R9g/R0bhDhw0/IE=; b=nEQWaShVXrUKsViPGFJjTMtIlTQkqEMGMIsOlzrWW61QHpr0Gonic7zXXHAv1+kJyA L+oMgVHyNaPlIgE96UQgLdHYHtzlkInaTYmHjE7UuGhbOhVRukbp8p8blr5nJL/a+V1/ 44KQR+Lf2tXdNBMKq9vkw2IobWHNcW70lX6UJKKZ4iX29xP5aJBe4nr6KgWnD0kTcxh+ 7JN3HHVzA6MDtuAtKJZmKOlfoL01ulxmj+yi39GFFkH2+nYMWURTzvhyMzFAXXCJ+KnO ILMbCrzBfJ3je8WHcUsAOmgoMYV0b5prV4edQOn7xH17IHEHDCqv+KHZTykR+XUOr+wo VFnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327Snr/9adqiPrcZ3xWWmfe/MwAV/8QYwwjqB2pmzXRmAWmCKBF tuRdxczdPbPIcjtdhi+1dMoaTZwfyIWWbowpb9hGAIJUX0SyIgua
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwy7nm6adjTpmUVa4PLBVwHkmtOpxo90vWz6SVhJhcbrLXKfKobaJSVnroGIp+vJJiZvIpN/XhQ0FfPhzNdcFg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:49d:: with SMTP id v29mr13035600lfq.185.1621923203312; Mon, 24 May 2021 23:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3dd49c5d-1c1c-4aa3-9628-c526e33d06bb@www.fastmail.com> <48005.1621868751@critter.freebsd.dk> <2c40188c-b650-4d9b-aec2-d74545bea407@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2c40188c-b650-4d9b-aec2-d74545bea407@www.fastmail.com>
From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 07:13:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH_hAJFF2dh-fmOJZRanGgftBngADVvLxvg9ygvm1pGGceX78Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::133; envelope-from=cory@lukasa.co.uk; helo=mail-lf1-x133.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=cory@lukasa.co.uk domain=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1llQJr-0004gR-0F 88bd99a58fb67b9c27c792d169b9e1ba
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Who is using experimental codepoints in HTTP/2?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_hAJFF2dh-fmOJZRanGgftBngADVvLxvg9ygvm1pGGceX78Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38817
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 22:09, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021, at 01:05, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > SNMP did the latter and that seems like a good call: The
> > `enterprise-numbers` IANA registry is now up to 57468, despite the
> > people advocating for 16 bit fields back then assuring us there
> > would be /no way/ for that to ever happen.
>
> QUIC has done the same also and that seems like the right call here.  2^62 values is enough that we are unlikely to see the space exhausted.

We can throw this idea on the "only with new ALPN" pile with the others.