Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2015 02:20 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BA81A1B12 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id npc0Tt7xCVvG for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17F21A6EF9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YdUg8-0007Ah-Jr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:16:20 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:16:20 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YdUg8-0007Ah-Jr@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1YdUg3-00078a-Q4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:16:15 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1YdUg2-0005AV-UZ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:16:15 +0000
Received: by obvd1 with SMTP id d1so109150678obv.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8KCF9kPUrTyq1yQ18aZaAvdDBP6She2hqhVmsOous0s=; b=x/2arEMeu6xNkus8Z+bZ78OLYxUvnjNQntutlQ0LpXrRXYcYr8fFx5iqJkOpiARdr2 wXwUOM2AJX2CbjuhpMD0zDr3001DYDlTJ319aqLXAL6TA8DtdqVo41a38ps62vsSp/72 Xn1uZGTarzWkG6z6+yuNpjJOT06GS/KIw8okSD6Hq0hnzIvMtqkyy2s2ouBFagi1krJ6 cZUcYKSmVCXprg48V70cm9XZKB2K/Rt96meI+x6vWwwu3pkdSnH+O/1KAPXFWThqXYB5 wxN0BXvKMbb/I4/IiWNFktjlul8JR2DWBKu20UQuhzKoiFl2p1S38QSDzlB5cNqM17b+ 9fRg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.132.33 with SMTP id or1mr44756925oeb.82.1427940949100; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.48.151 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABb0SYS+kTiCKHQUWfnVWV-DKfY6TVWm81UT1BE7xHAtg42E7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4AC59768-2519-4B95-86F3-43C19B4329E7@mnot.net> <D24E0668-56B7-4457-8E7C-DF7623AEF77B@mnot.net> <CABb0SYS+kTiCKHQUWfnVWV-DKfY6TVWm81UT1BE7xHAtg42E7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:15:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXmtyt+r8Q-cJp2M+e8jnBc888pDXs6kd7N6bE-E1b2WQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.174; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f174.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.897, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YdUg2-0005AV-UZ c3a623de834f59161bd2ee65e25e868a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXmtyt+r8Q-cJp2M+e8jnBc888pDXs6kd7N6bE-E1b2WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29209
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 1 April 2015 at 18:58, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com> wrote: > Is draft 17 the final? I never found an actual finalized RFC. The RFC editor is working on -17. There will be no technical changes between that and the final document.
- h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Max Bruce
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Martin Thomson
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Greg Wilkins
- Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE Mark Nottingham