IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 29 January 2024 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D06CC14F70C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:39:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOEaGbff-Tgh for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE1AEC14F6F1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1rUTip-000T2U-Hq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1rUTip-000T2U-Hq@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <cabo@tzi.org>) id 1rUTio-000T1T-4r for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:54 +0000
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de ([2001:638:708:32::21]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <cabo@tzi.org>) id 1rUTil-00ALeJ-Qv for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:53 +0000
Received: from eduroam-0298.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-0298.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.17.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TNssJ6P6gzDCgw; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:38:44 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB6019C5D8DF60CE53F27E0722987E2@AM0PR07MB6019.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:38:44 +0100
Cc: "draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 728235524.202644-c1b6f3b583613b2e11ad443731e170ca
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <56617A72-D775-41DC-88E8-3A82DC5225C7@tzi.org>
References: <AM0PR07MB6019C5D8DF60CE53F27E0722987E2@AM0PR07MB6019.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:638:708:32::21; envelope-from=cabo@tzi.org; helo=smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1rUTil-00ALeJ-Qv ac72d38749448675261ef476127dd80e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/56617A72-D775-41DC-88E8-3A82DC5225C7@tzi.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/51749
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/email/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2024-01-29, at 15:41, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> What parts of [I-D.draft-bray-unichars] is the reader supposed to look at? Or if it is the whole document, could we have some context around it?

It seems that sfbis refers to Unicode codepoints where it should have referred to Unicode scalar values (what are said to be codepoints now, need to allow encoding in UTF-8, which only applies to Unicode scalar values).
Once this is fixed, I don’t think this reference adds anything but lots of confusion.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status