From ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=ietf.org@listhub.w3.org Mon Jan 29 07:39:13 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D06CC14F70C for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:39:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.659 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOEaGbff-Tgh for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:39:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE1AEC14F6F1 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:39:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUTip-000T2U-Hq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:55 +0000 Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:55 +0000 Resent-Message-Id: Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUTio-000T1T-4r for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de ([2001:638:708:32::21]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUTil-00ALeJ-Qv for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:38:53 +0000 Received: from eduroam-0298.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-0298.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.17.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TNssJ6P6gzDCgw; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:38:44 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:38:44 +0100 Cc: "draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis@ietf.org" , HTTP Working Group X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 728235524.202644-c1b6f3b583613b2e11ad443731e170ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <56617A72-D775-41DC-88E8-3A82DC5225C7@tzi.org> References: To: Francesca Palombini X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:638:708:32::21; envelope-from=cabo@tzi.org; helo=smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1rUTil-00ALeJ-Qv ac72d38749448675261ef476127dd80e X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05 Archived-At: Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/51749 X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org Precedence: list List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: On 2024-01-29, at 15:41, Francesca Palombini = wrote: >=20 > What parts of [I-D.draft-bray-unichars] is the reader supposed to look = at? Or if it is the whole document, could we have some context around = it? It seems that sfbis refers to Unicode codepoints where it should have = referred to Unicode scalar values (what are said to be codepoints now, = need to allow encoding in UTF-8, which only applies to Unicode scalar = values). Once this is fixed, I don=E2=80=99t think this reference adds anything = but lots of confusion. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten