Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813C121F9173 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:58:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.298 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2lm6yp7hXll for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E6521F9012 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UT5Fg-00070G-1o for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:56:56 +0000 Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:56:56 +0000 Resent-Message-Id: Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UT5Fd-0006z7-Bi for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:56:53 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UT5Fc-0003qc-Np for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:56:53 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x4so1360348obh.10 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:56:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TnOV7KJcI+HVZMbEI8D9flh/juh0jJH9pql64OVvbCQ=; b=sopfrGlQfiqEPL92B+ER9oFP1xyd7VkULttJnUI354QDrARA3xAZMp4tE2yooghKjO ZdpMNaMt44U+s7RpoxFXP+pRJAywwRfnqRgzlfVB/cgkjWRJutGViY1xoo9BeTZD0Dzp bpdr/CFg6l0XCH12CRXtokFqeECd7oIL7i1FLu+IwLssot7zL7s9cvCBCDscyVaPIUi7 MQ6ZOwJLTtLwQQTABd0Ni7SbnsUr8rd0BbVR5Nn2OHS81LhhKNQYVQIKLDRHKZtt0rdE 9Mw8Njx5ZV0frQYh2alUYzIqHvRC/RY6CezdL4EHgvUgF/oRWAfvB80wE93tRjt4ew2e j03A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.125.200 with SMTP id ms8mr2876753obb.67.1366354586798; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.141.83 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:56:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130419053845.GF19970@1wt.eu> References: <516F76CB.20406@treenet.co.nz> <20130418060211.GC13063@1wt.eu> <468FAE72-012D-43EB-A5A7-EAA137687F87@mnot.net> <20130419053845.GF19970@1wt.eu> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:56:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: Roberto Peon To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Mark Nottingham , Amos Jeffries , HTTP Working Group Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012942cac8916804dab13707 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.179; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f179.google.com X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.734, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UT5Fc-0003qc-Np 6e2663f7712f3bc6e44b34b675516eaf X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: p1: BWS Archived-At: Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/17356 X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org Precedence: list List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: --089e012942cac8916804dab13707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:27:21AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > We can either: > > > > - make it a MUST > > - document what the exceptional circumstances are that cause the SHOULD > (but I don't think it's that kind of SHOULD) > > - downgrade it to an "ought to" > > > > I do note that we say "generate" there (which I missed before, sorry); > in our > > terminology, that means you DON'T need to fix it up when forwarding it; > it's > > only when you're actually creating the element that this applies. > > Ah OK then I agree with a MUST as well. > > +1 then :-) > > Willy > > --089e012942cac8916804dab13707 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
+1


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:27:21AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> We can either:
>
> - make it a MUST
> - document what the exceptional circumstances are that cause the SHOULD (but I don't think it's that kind of SHOULD)
> - downgrade it to an "ought to"
>
> I do note that we say "generate" there (which I missed before, sorry); in our
> terminology, that means you DON'T need to fix it up when forwarding it; it's
> only when you're actually creating the element that this applies.

Ah OK then I agree with a MUST as well.

+1 then :-)

Willy


--089e012942cac8916804dab13707--