Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant?
Eric J Bowman <mellowmutt@zoho.com> Fri, 04 September 2020 10:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85823A0962 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 03:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (768-bit key) header.from=mellowmutt@zoho.com header.d=zoho.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zoho.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cF6Q-m4AZSrm for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 03:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849B03A095E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 03:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kE8jz-0005ON-KX for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:14:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:14:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kE8jz-0005ON-KX@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mellowmutt@zoho.com>) id 1kE8jw-0005NW-7x for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:14:40 +0000
Received: from sender4-pp-o93.zoho.com ([136.143.188.93]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mellowmutt@zoho.com>) id 1kE8ju-0002ux-H7 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:14:40 +0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599214434; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=LnOtbeMzWgz7l7tx9PKWz3nCEIhRwFW6QJbJXt5HfhYvjLPiI8wptm3BpbcgfPuMpPjOegJU3YLmYMXrY20LYW+ut1sZhDcSRhdLzAGv5e9aMThJwWaoNyDzECDUUih3IjzTgnVTAQxK4Q5TwB/+MDVU5UAUYdzsXmVJ6TlxlLg=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1599214434; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=ezxQpAZ9UQ81LrHsIILQDv8gvuYUT/tauO6jC4TG5JA=; b=SNMOCEU3xY0VUfCFW8kUgnXhdbwBKDSGp8GbhdfNp5d9mHu9nMhuV1CpMqLd/e4f9hzQbg6L0NUGCqQfbxkp2UuqcB/9WA+Nk4dMujsn5c7qPHbaytZsO+ViLoUdJRcEaquXFGi5stHL4sDbyL2BJroS88FwJnluGptCeV0+9Cw=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=zoho.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mellowmutt@zoho.com; dmarc=pass header.from=<mellowmutt@zoho.com> header.from=<mellowmutt@zoho.com>
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; b=mcIMXEb1qwSG3joiUJqxiAU52LGcCJ+12kDhK6FJTUfjkq8vB4fMgoubRxkOlfp2Z+It10bL0N3P Tr1/wRlSwFes/JMwbilfHqbsn0zQW6gG+TrxjC9nHNyK862QWg3U
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1599214434; s=zm2020; d=zoho.com; i=mellowmutt@zoho.com; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=ezxQpAZ9UQ81LrHsIILQDv8gvuYUT/tauO6jC4TG5JA=; b=i5wDx2D4ywBuaZw3/8tsYnfD8DtFWyYkjUpCouXtj3w5ecdiQG81La8g0GrOb+82 LN6kO7R1ZShavaFo1ulpfC+x2ObJSnXFuscHNQRvSdUten39yOIw0T4Sjnk+C6aJ4Au pboULy/AgfYYPkWWWeQcP5Ctghn0+TkFKfjy1dGY=
Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1599214432177780.5691611982921; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 03:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [65.117.211.248] by mail.zoho.com with HTTP;Fri, 4 Sep 2020 03:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:13:52 -0700
From: Eric J Bowman <mellowmutt@zoho.com>
To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Stenberg Daniel <daniel@haxx.se>, Ietf Http Wg <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <174589baf9a.ff9982e315528.2152792386350576528@zoho.com>
In-Reply-To: <31556AEF-B97E-4441-9175-07F90DD5C59B@greenbytes.de>
References: <174578870d7.1265f983c12789.7350275676057542310@zoho.com> <20200904054051.GA2905@1wt.eu> <17457f2cfaa.b1c12efb13715.7081201094742751967@zoho.com> <13FF9481-ADFB-4006-A237-9CA795507C5B@greenbytes.de> <20200904082136.GC2905@1wt.eu> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009041059380.15806@tvnag.unkk.fr> <20200904090527.GI2905@1wt.eu> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009041106200.15806@tvnag.unkk.fr> <20200904091320.GJ2905@1wt.eu> <31556AEF-B97E-4441-9175-07F90DD5C59B@greenbytes.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_42423_638732651.1599214432154"
Importance: Medium
User-Agent: Zoho Mail
X-Mailer: Zoho Mail
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.93; envelope-from=mellowmutt@zoho.com; helo=sender4-pp-o93.zoho.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1kE8ju-0002ux-H7 030763f4ce55d132f65536c6f3f51833
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/174589baf9a.ff9982e315528.2152792386350576528@zoho.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38014
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
---- On Fri, 04 Sep 2020 02:28:47 -0700 Stefan Eissing <mailto:stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote ---- > > I mean, to be honest, the Internet worked best at the time of HTTP/1.0. ;) > > Stefan > If I were President I'd sign an executive order banning cookies. ;) -Eric
- Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Eric J Bowman
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Willy Tarreau
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Daniel Stenberg
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Eric J Bowman
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Willy Tarreau
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Stefan Eissing
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Matthew Kerwin
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Sergey Ponomarev
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Eric J Bowman
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Willy Tarreau
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Daniel Stenberg
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Willy Tarreau
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Daniel Stenberg
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Willy Tarreau
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Stefan Eissing
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Eric J Bowman
- Re: Is HTTP/1.0 still relevant? Amos Jeffries