IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4664)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 13 April 2016 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9A612DF23 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QCIkRy0Lon2D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E56312DEF7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aqHIA-00018B-1h for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:40:58 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:40:58 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aqHIA-00018B-1h@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1aqHI5-00017Q-UD for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:40:53 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1aqHI3-00059x-RQ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:40:53 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.123] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbA4j-1bWWqJ0kzh-00kfr6; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:40:02 +0200
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, ylafon@w3.org, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mnot@mnot.net
References: <20160413084140.73D99180006@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: amichai2@amichais.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <570E13F2.1060604@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:40:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160413084140.73D99180006@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:blmWetTGYW0bmSt+2MkgZK9SbaZ+QFR0ZwrHR2JtCv6BrJSe53x oI910IQ0f9P6eSUIKL0RL3OX/0dVoStukNphTNMf3YinDV/NmsBbkRyB3e2EWzADwbhEtfk kpWBvFHRcZ9RZQ11If9KqHAUrO+KBi3ntI47tX8f6tDujeExGTlvoiJithZannFMDGTfeGO fbgvrxxCsiyDJy/LE3F7A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xH1GthnQ+dM=:QJWFT02VdHSS8w5+/fun8N iLYYUlVoiohLk8D+3UULQ3wv/pU0jjHifL9UTfuakYsOQS7FaFmyUDNxEbLJFigCfifUuu+pY iPhCB8VCIqzCbz8dDeulfjXujhe346NYAmS54dgEvtACWZuX24RE72RhsHo3TC+Gli3/Mg8Sj GjTpzviQ/WrMCHllrXJ8bOibVPnDg9CseRjdrbQ5wEe+V+NYcSw8hbC1vKH/Nn1MUm7u2NW/K xBBeFu/ZlDHlSazgkOrHGpseHxRa59wyil8WUn/+IFEEenCNWnR9i4QEZdUohB6Q7q+pxwiCO Y0bqBJtyvNqULu9WS4Y50O1/L/ayCAH4LVbhJSovz1xrRZnHq0gnPTqeeqXBWm/D1ofFoPUEF 3rL2CdDrDZaiRRpYI4yJYlPEzDksitr4AGgrQi9TKKOBtKtYig2GuORAPBdC4/5vahud44Bdv 7p+Q8m7AzK96VAgPqsp/yTRgA2ST8ufFP6vnyW2uFXl45C4rcQCQ0wRbx2LkRiz92K3qBmEHs iYucxz/9cdnNn5Y8C43YES9QpEUued9EL7V+jqHMo8E5IMRlGQXn8TugQx3IlsqUYdfYyxdUa neEGrknD8rBSF2kdH2/yweM3Fq2wfe8G0z6N595zckPnxvllIn+4LKITwxu8sz55ZjZFBAInZ Ae0y182Ju4/LuK4PbXf222/2086R6QEnpa5Hm+hNSeYYobnsd8qNdQthCyq7YktIyoD3INmcw 6WBFbrASV54gU7UsDNpWTkzcUHegxRF3O2U5YMUEUJeauwVbq5YClLjcJxAWtANCMDakPJpNM efrPrTC
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.350, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aqHI3-00059x-RQ 76cccb0efdede8162532eed279473ac8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4664)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/570E13F2.1060604@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31436
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-04-13 10:41, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7233,
> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7233&eid=4664
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Amichai Rothman <amichai2@amichais.net>
>
> Section: 4.4
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> The 416 (Range Not Satisfiable) status code indicates that none of
> the ranges in the request's Range header field (Section 3.1) overlap
> the current extent of the selected resource or that the set of ranges
> requested has been rejected due to invalid ranges or an excessive
> request of small or overlapping ranges.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The 416 (Range Not Satisfiable) status code indicates that none of
> the ranges in the request's Range header field (Section 3.1) overlap
> the current extent of the selected representation or that the set of
> ranges requested has been rejected due to invalid ranges or an excessive
> request of small or overlapping ranges.
> ...

I agree that "representation" would have been the correct term here.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email