Re: Calls for Adoption -- Cookie-Related Specifications

Remy Lebeau <remy@lebeausoftware.org> Tue, 22 December 2015 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F3A1A90CE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:48:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qS2QzRRmPcE5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720641A90B5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aBUko-0005JO-Fg for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:45:58 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:45:58 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aBUko-0005JO-Fg@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <remy@lebeausoftware.org>) id 1aBUkg-0005IY-Qd for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:45:50 +0000
Received: from p3plsmtpa12-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([68.178.252.233]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <remy@lebeausoftware.org>) id 1aBUkf-0000vC-BN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:45:50 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([108.184.46.71]) by p3plsmtpa12-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id wllM1r00B1Y8uW401llMrc; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:45:21 -0700
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <74546826-47A5-4997-954F-BE13D29A84B0@mnot.net>
From: Remy Lebeau <remy@lebeausoftware.org>
Organization: Lebeau Software
Message-ID: <5679C470.4040506@lebeausoftware.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:45:20 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <74546826-47A5-4997-954F-BE13D29A84B0@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=68.178.252.233; envelope-from=remy@lebeausoftware.org; helo=p3plsmtpa12-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aBUkf-0000vC-BN 95b805ab2915fbcf4b6e3dd0424d16a2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Calls for Adoption -- Cookie-Related Specifications
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5679C470.4040506@lebeausoftware.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30814
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I am the primary maintainer of Indy, a popular Internet protocols 
library for the Delphi/C++Builder community.  I implemented most of RFC 
6265 back in 2011 when it was still a draft, and then finalized in 
2012.  I have not updated my implementation since.  I, too, would like 
to wait for the latest drafts to be finalized before I start making more 
code changes.

Remy Lebeau
Lebeau Software

On 12/21/2015 10:18 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> As discussed earlier <http://www.w3.org/mid/FAF2C2E8-0A6A-4C34-B4C4-57190AAE118D@mnot.net>, we are going to use a Call for Adoption process to assure that what we specify in terms of changes to Cookies -- if anything -- will actually get implemented.
>
> Based on what we've talked about so far, I believe two specifications are ready for consideration:
>
> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-leave-secure-cookies-alone-04
> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-prefixes-05
>
> So, please discuss on-list:
>
> 1) Your intent to implement these specifications (or lack thereof).
> 2) Your support for these specifications (or lack thereof).
> 3) Any other Internet-Drafts that you believe we should consider in a revision of the Cookie specification.
>
> We'll talk about this over the next few weeks, and develop a plan for RFC6265bis based upon those discussions.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>