Re: Op-sec simplification

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 31 October 2016 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE75129B85 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wO_goQSpvHWP for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE212129BB8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c1Lny-00063x-Jy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:15:50 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:15:50 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c1Lny-00063x-Jy@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c1Lnt-00063C-Vz for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:15:45 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1c1Lno-00042U-0R for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 23:15:40 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z190so180146550qkc.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tyb7EmghszfrYHXV322ensNuY6KuQI0jLlIc9wbQqmQ=; b=wPNuOns5McIwaLC686umue01kvRxvYfJMmYE/yfzDanKxWnPPefSNoGWQEfW2xNr3r uJoylOsuyNP3panUCdyTaSY10MQJkGfxgl2yuvwhK34KAwowfCeRvtTmpDPrrQUannLn bcxKir47Us1wh54zWLxS2oUMYFHtAURYGHq6R8EbfZAtBDXp9lo8OWvcrCH+EaRr7nRu 1dw38I483Mb1he/khei5qwOkws685srfCK0K+IwYWFyqIOq9NSnwDz6dJjG5MGWKmr3z 5YiU1Kli86OpXuCaFOcwng7DGIgRMcrtLsUT+UFLWt8VteOmWBOQ9OtMbiSq6Gps5olJ eEfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tyb7EmghszfrYHXV322ensNuY6KuQI0jLlIc9wbQqmQ=; b=mngVNOCe5fPvmXzjKpJ4GqGqb7WDPKIjFi0vrEj2+LU9SY/1DveISYTblaVN/nV5Wd eIEGg/Ru1WrLvKH3Wk2YX6rBJQS/KlHIC1XBrtRwno/O0AV46k9CI27KzZdDCKOs6JOu lvAG2YZKFVajURebWETgbzIfNW32gbaQNmsMlj6GRZKdzLCCh9lacafAApUktPb/4wFO 11HTmsUqzHv6jolGZmYse3WooVUIT/gOK7fiA+md8UC2UrE5LxyX4aMpK6qF1yW/hxGN HfI3MYI0N2QInHEVWZECZqorFaf1Ndbzgnn9pWoq8A2g/2GhQ9NHwnmnrePiA25PqGAc Msyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdO5bSQluyadOOioEaG6YSyVM/tdqV8zKmhayxgcpruAvFhQN4x7aR/5+YGXHIeWFMivNWBBP7chS+3Qw==
X-Received: by 10.55.99.141 with SMTP id x135mr26040740qkb.147.1477955713606; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <842E817E-77E4-45E0-B5E3-D45F8D7AFA15@mnot.net>
References: <20161031053239.E9C6D12F5D@welho-filter3.welho.com> <842E817E-77E4-45E0-B5E3-D45F8D7AFA15@mnot.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:15:13 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVm2roXz5BiQeh5m2a_zcsfC3rFZ2pnoQ_m9k6b3K=58w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.178; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.253, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c1Lno-00042U-0R af6854355fc45e3af92fcace772b9306
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Op-sec simplification
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVm2roXz5BiQeh5m2a_zcsfC3rFZ2pnoQ_m9k6b3K=58w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32765
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 1 November 2016 at 09:41, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Hold on -- are we layering in a new requirement to use the absolute form of the URL?

I don't know how we carry the scheme any other way.  We might try to
weasel this as being not "directly" to the origin server.

Maybe I should point out that this is in contradiction to that section.

(FWIW, the servers I'm aware of all handle absolute URIs well enough.)