RE: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)

Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Wed, 04 January 2012 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E9311E8081 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:01:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xp86E-yyHu-H for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:01:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F4A11E8085 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:01:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1RiIxU-0001Gv-5X for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:00:16 +0000
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <masinter@adobe.com>) id 1RiIxJ-000148-Cr for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:00:05 +0000
Received: from exprod6og115.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.35]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <masinter@adobe.com>) id 1RiIxG-0004xT-JD for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:00:05 +0000
Reinject: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob115.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTwPcujVq9RoZ5NxElArI+fSnEQtpt4gF@postini.com; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:00:02 PST
Reinject: from exprod6og109.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.22]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id q044xbPu012422 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob109.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTwPcIexUCEGfDkwLsZGgi+IyR5dgbgwM@postini.com; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:57:36 PST
Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q044tEaa013747; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q044v27o013934; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:57:01 -0800
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:57:01 -0800
Thread-Topic: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)
Thread-Index: AczKJhgAIIN4l5UrR1GN5xzDLo+aNgAbtT9A
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06121B5AE5@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
References: <6A53E99A-019D-4F6D-A33D-24524CD34E17@mnot.net> <4EFDFA17.4080804@gmx.de> <4F031419.1050708@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F031419.1050708@gmx.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.18.1.35; envelope-from=masinter@adobe.com; helo=exprod6og115.obsmtp.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1RiIxG-0004xT-JD 2c01b0d0d7ce8b3c6719981a09adec61
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06121B5AE5@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/11962
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1RiIxU-0001Gv-5X@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:00:16 +0000

...

"Almost", because it doesn't use Base.fragment when R.frament is undefined.

a) Should we try describe the algorithm based on RFC 3986 ("do relative resolution as defined by ..., then, if the result doesn't have a fragment, add the one from the Base URI")?
b) Is this potentially an erratum for RFC 3986?

a) sounds good.
b) I'd call it an "update" rather than an erratum.