Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Tue, 31 March 2015 21:00 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2F61ACEFB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcbqPeMRW312 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90AAC1ACEE7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Yd3Dm-0005kQ-R5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:57:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:57:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Yd3Dm-0005kQ-R5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1Yd3Dg-0005jd-AH for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:57:08 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1Yd3De-0001Ji-Ho for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:57:07 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92E03B8A2; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:56:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2VKufbN040147; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:56:41 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-reply-to: <20150331182521.GF7183@1wt.eu>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <1C7436D4-D1EF-454C-BC14-E8C00165AA2E@mnot.net> <39087.1427812836@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150331182521.GF7183@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <40145.1427835401.1@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:56:41 +0000
Message-ID: <40146.1427835401@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@phk.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.388, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Yd3De-0001Ji-Ho 563505977328029b0b44333ff91a3bec
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/40146.1427835401@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29140
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
-------- In message <20150331182521.GF7183@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >> Third, are there *any* valid reasons to even allow other charsets >> than ISO-8859-1 or UTF-8 from 2015 forward ? > >Idem. And if we don't need to do more than that, then probably we >just need a boolean to say "this is not ISO-8859-1, hence this is >UTF-8" and make the encoding implicit by the sole presence of the >encoding tag (eg: the "*" or "=", I don't remember right now). In that case I could live with it being per field, because the signal could be a single character and we could probably dispense with the % encoding too. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
- Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Amos Jeffries
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Cory Benfield
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis squid3
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Willy Tarreau
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Poul-Henning Kamp
- Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis, was:… Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis, … Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis, … Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis Amos Jeffries