IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?

Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> Tue, 19 February 2013 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B53321F8B7E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:55:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NPMiqLBNdUXD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:55:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9AD21F8B77 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U7eH6-00079l-Vs for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:53:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:53:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U7eH6-00079l-Vs@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mark@coactus.com>) id 1U7eGq-00078f-RY for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:53:32 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mark@coactus.com>) id 1U7eGq-0002bz-4I for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:53:32 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e12so5231945wge.22 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dstCWkUHrdBj52tIlmMMBv5MRPjI8VD63he2WXg8sUM=; b=ZOLe2CUqPVxiMH2HYgo5cYjJzplIR4pfVR3OeAj6rOjqidLV95ePQG8UQM0l9kETwg eNOyZcKTJcSVWxeQFaID/nGeHJxfvf7NtsZK1s1swWAVZXSpIBI0KsmJtC/IMz7ekNnW 49RaDYO13QIwFUmcih008eJp83vcSpOPWKPaj2eEeuWctQ2UnjohRPC54oRfvcpEqj0w AoXsRgWEC1GPxQyZEkA8Znp+b/lJlR6W2SKTlDpyny7dXhr+qgXh9JvIOp0wOO6lcWGm QISG+bak+kXKyaY0LKFwv+h81+2gqpr78OH8gUCYpUmoCtwt6jVRaBD8lfBe2chdLbiP BYzw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.75.177 with SMTP id d17mr22661168wiw.16.1361245985225; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Sender: mark@coactus.com
Received: by 10.194.23.102 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [184.175.20.252]
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiF6EM8_aQgUm=nPS5XqaG25iRGNke_rnHTM1vTGMXdfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwiF6EM8_aQgUm=nPS5XqaG25iRGNke_rnHTM1vTGMXdfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:53:05 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Sgci807jQRC6wGLtc1-owP81ULo
Message-ID: <CALcoZioKMpjyKSjjmSfnnxHauG-k33m24cqVHP5LKEsSZzt0ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKD73IYJ69aOiyc53bvm2JjXvriZUF78/tzuX4ubkVKt+LWJhnKBCZWDYJNIeEqWuYswVI
Received-SPF: none client-ip=74.125.82.43; envelope-from=mark@coactus.com; helo=mail-wg0-f43.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.100, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U7eGq-0002bz-4I 46fd1b2ad02554af1ee6dec0141645b0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CALcoZioKMpjyKSjjmSfnnxHauG-k33m24cqVHP5LKEsSZzt0ag@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16671
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
> HTTP 1.1 has a request/response pattern. This covers 90% of needs but means
> that if the protocol is followed correctly forces a round trip delay on each
> content request.

It doesn't force it; you can pipeline the requests.

Mark.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email