Re: Design Issue: Max Concurrent Streams Limit and Unidirectional Streams

[James M Snell <[e-mail]>]

Yes, Outward bound only.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Martin Thomson
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> On 25 April 2013 12:33, James M Snell <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Perhaps a simpler approach would be to just redefine the limit such
>> that an endpoint MUST NOT have more than MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS in the
>> Open state at any given time. We have already established that once
>> the stream is half-closed, new frames cannot be sent, so once the
>> server half-closes a steam it initiates, the counter is decremented
>> and the server is permitted to initiate another stream. The client can
>> choose to reject those additional streams if it chooses.
>
> Do you mean that only outward bound streams count toward the
> concurrency limit.  That could be workable; it's certainly easier to
> explain.