IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt

Adam Rice <ricea@google.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9701A06CB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 01:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DtnDSgziUIag for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 01:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4E291A067E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 01:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XKNQ4-0004gx-PB for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:08:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:08:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XKNQ4-0004gx-PB@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ricea@google.com>) id 1XKNPa-0004d9-OD for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:07:58 +0000
Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ricea@google.com>) id 1XKNPZ-0007OA-Te for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:07:58 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hy10so10384320vcb.32 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 01:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EIs7FfgVoEUswzIUz08Mw0rXt5hFIFyepCJ+hAqLqDg=; b=X6tSBRiGRaffKih7tb027WMa96Zi7IbTmeT3qVTQ4Nwp9WUkoTbcrOs7OcxbRVPg6+ 46AOijVaNID423mWgWVCaTAgl5krfH9bOYV1uCgCjRQ8nbXcdLq22kGWm+Ch/6xWsrqw lWJD6UmJBS7SY9zs7rLcRao5pLkWS7HBoA7bIVwfRK1psOU1jW5pEScPkpA0guT1fZYY xv3ZZGn5dfZlZthWJrbDaeQk/loAC9m5LIiq97+rX7oT4CDpxcUd/OI5liqxuIKdj0kh TI8Ui2KttLNmHNgAaV07c7NfKY/ZQB07B/+homLp8+NJlCrlfVHhwJ36nPqBAYsIzZMI 3JJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EIs7FfgVoEUswzIUz08Mw0rXt5hFIFyepCJ+hAqLqDg=; b=FLLJzeur6qoOxfI9pnf5buyKspJgnp0jHGVlElU8Jl9UdjPZRaWhdV7vJ19Kq8Trh6 CBVJom7Mpcpjb3bcvb+vZMSGhgkIYJ7QSUfsBIJgJzz2a0QQw6JyWmWNeSVs+NK/g49f mDGd8AxY87nSDFH/zMNOgTWdWvU8Cjr6FgUsI6q5kY8HTJ1jmBtQGuybV7nxN/mt3TX5 sw7zbJY4qDZEzM3pDboLY0sBGXtcTT6wbs58hd3I8iHnKLGycoujQ3WIuKz9RqllnrCy sjzEQ8vJUVQEo923UqDGez8zJmVYkkmk+oenX8sdAReSYAw/U5lFPbFTBkF+y8csw79v OBqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnm6wovkfsrTAgGwfXwCWKHyH/BBsEjh7MQoTb2Gm2l1yhQHxV6XqoMryhZceEig+m0AyRL
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.61.136 with SMTP id p8mr66238vdr.15.1408608451602; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 01:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.0.135 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 01:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F59390.2030106@treenet.co.nz>
References: <20140818233839.23251.81316.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <858FBAA8-F0D5-43A0-A621-7D504AB3327A@mnot.net> <CAH_y2NEekpgDNO+OsDELarcSi3nn72gHb98L9R66TntcD9bUiQ@mail.gmail.com> <3859D490-6B6E-4C7D-A3AF-9F1CF6F69045@mnot.net> <CAH_y2NGivMoS_WSudKKM4A=Jnr6bKneJZ5zuTmWrQm=XESYdYw@mail.gmail.com> <6F9EE13B-1791-4010-8953-3172A57AC172@mnot.net> <CAHixhFqbw00FrGSrCRS1rK_HqEj8osRXtXpj+DtYmU=tqFyBkQ@mail.gmail.com> <53F59390.2030106@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:07:31 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHixhFqe8tqu9c+iVFG=n-YiFrgcj+xzstMvzGqNzjyfr=t7jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Rice <ricea@google.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1136ad7262d83d05011f36df"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.173; envelope-from=ricea@google.com; helo=mail-vc0-f173.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.433, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XKNPZ-0007OA-Te b97e8b966c3c260a5b954fa64a88b976
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAHixhFqe8tqu9c+iVFG=n-YiFrgcj+xzstMvzGqNzjyfr=t7jg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26686
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 21 August 2014 15:37, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> * if use of this header is picked up widely then we will be headed
> toward a situation where more proxies can relatively safely have blanket
> rejection on CONNECT traffic omiting it, a lot of current day attacks
> will fail, and BCP 188 Pervasive Monitoring stops being pervasive.
>

I don't believe that anyone who has the capability to intercept and decrypt
traffic will voluntarily give it up.

Since it is trivial for malware to forge this header, I do not believe it
will stop any attacks.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status