IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 15 November 2016 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB981295AD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:25:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id beUtaH14okdz for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1EA01295D7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c6lB8-0003NI-Px for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:22:06 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:22:06 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c6lB8-0003NI-Px@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c6lB2-0003LJ-VO; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:22:01 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1c6lAx-0002pb-3u; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:21:55 +0000
Received: from [31.133.147.187] ([31.133.147.187]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0ML6XF-1c6UBX1ZEP-000Its; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:21:22 +0100
To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
References: <147647657198.18541.16272058165406493619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c01d2bd4-4495-ba7d-b3bd-3b3bab4314e2@gmx.de> <7fdc3595-9e50-3515-1822-ef13e9197518@gmx.de> <7e92cd24-569e-7eae-e9d9-397660ec0798@andrew.cmu.edu> <5869f8f6-0ded-16a6-e844-0a7e982e6936@gmx.de> <543f32e6-ca27-6c04-9f3a-68550eda24c4@gmx.de> <4bd5b083-65cf-f41c-ef35-80f468a191df@andrew.cmu.edu> <8be05398-476f-cdf5-6048-1ad26f0da32a@gmx.de> <9b021292-f697-fac9-c79e-495480435e27@andrew.cmu.edu>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <931ccd58-e3fc-bda4-98a7-423a5a960641@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:21:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9b021292-f697-fac9-c79e-495480435e27@andrew.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ihDgfSsgO+TJ6vuOuM2Zh9Pi+DnhKlcQaWqqd0dGLv+3Y2Dp7Ix BmKNAkA8S3l4UTyKixSRAo1TDGRUZ3uBc2LZ30TGEpyRl3tsAJ/IpOyJ9KOMxmhUecoyIYK jzxGNMZ4yDJl/GzRFb8tEaVnFY16tT8zGBAcDhWmIxlq94PPDPWnYTrvsSpzP3AzVC9CXTI eeNQB5Sicv7j43ciPRWrw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ZQvhi1rsJH8=:MfLBTmj+vqwpNGIwr+upDO EpuFjsNdmzngKDrKe6JuCZGSiKONY4N7SKlGcVKDqmtgsI3MnLGEPARVGKfd3J5swxF12SDh/ Kh5fdzweVbl/+jhUeJoBMHAp4M2e42HZzU2nAUMuOh3WaRkvgmO+0UNQtAYkq2Tme/OSBxxIC RqHeI4zE96atGSWN1NRLOnwlczWv4h1b/4aAAV0UuSC2s5OMF3fQ0YEw09o5exyqlihTrckX/ BnYVwayxXRZahklNhGLKIYl4/sd5BCQBmEmIClo/qDcNHXWQfjDK0QDdbazd0kRAz8s8lbbDI +2MIawVzDoLRp1+PPV1CFdJzoRjzpi3YmDqRCgtky7beNDNTvFTK3bLNoJRYmHB/zuZu31Tzw tvsT/XhAdN9eZiG/mTq8X+sY9L95VIpR846Ctdd9sfxH3OSw5VTz0++iwxaeefQ0AltGZDmCS Q+JaLLnXrl3SOSQAeNofF8/T8wz3kJduVdCL4EvSO2MK4N+ER/YTJ+a4BLkEBd5hafjYuKSdG W/VnvKHLf+HmLC84DdJPVCGR2lCmJDzjzORNpC1Gyoiakb/vy26KxFCX0kkTIvtMX0r3jKaL4 SDaHZtQmGEcSlPyzRaIbrRyoxxfB0SMDXk6D5gonhX6lBL6NkChqhuTimrETkndVq/i/IkTKW EjXoBuVqDs8f+7pTqbqW7IC+FLKEuKsWFGBkqfYO8PUX0C78BKfj77khFu6AUdmtgth/Prhxz iMgTx6Vfd3R9qyvJbxFTfB4j0bm5nNSfXJ6DuPwswNV7SJxuVqXu4Fx/28FFCwMew5uQ7WZbe Z1CsE1m
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.114, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c6lAx-0002pb-3u 90b868c2abbbc3385ba34368d9907e78
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/931ccd58-e3fc-bda4-98a7-423a5a960641@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32909
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-11-15 22:07, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>
> On 11/15/2016 03:59 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2016-11-15 21:56, Ken Murchison wrote:
>>
>>> Just to clarify, which methods do you think need to have additional
>>> references?  PROPFIND, REPORT, and PROPPATCH because we alter the
>>> responses for return=minimal?  Also keep in mind the the server is
>>> always free to ignore the preference if it so chooses.
>>
>> Those, plus MKCOL, right?
>
> Hmm.  I'm not sure we alter anything specified by 4918 or 5689 for
> MKCOL.  Maybe there is an argument that we alter the MKCALENDAR response.

Aren't we altering the response for extended MKCOL?

> I do wonder why 5689 isn't listed as a reference for MKCOL since it adds
> a request body.

Oversight, I would say.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email