IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HTTP 2.0 next steps and TLS next protocol negotiation

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Tue, 12 February 2013 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB55021F86CE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:37:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xKBZ-lv8kYSa for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31D321F85E8 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U53sL-0001i7-Ot for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:37:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:37:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U53sL-0001i7-Ot@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1U53sE-0001er-DY for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:37:26 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1U53sC-0005om-U3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:37:26 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k1so6918792oag.5 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:36:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ehZBw+3f1B+ODFBJAs2sOlBavm9uesXA8bn38QIPJG0=; b=L2ZqTP9yOi7Yus5g/muU3hTWyycdRFwGQy7csmHHwSJuradH0DL6YvI24JPdTC8HWw wq0p4iZeDWq7d3t3Goqx6GBGoMlCrLS0MePqi9qc3WdYk1eUEGXiP4oS/DZ59BAFx06p 7KNArDAZ3JKO+R8D29PU1Aet3S9vUEEX3Cl3IKdMBzWGRXinLZT2lel9N8eo8cBSFzbV 2NQot34RAE6ECv0nifON0Wx5iWN1w8Ys2d36hU+HRf1amEwN6paBUOJkmeFAH7XdIqgX 49dnJoXXykhhrKjT8Z1ETE75mzyTi95kW4f5lad/Wnsf/87jgCv9oXlBJX6hD2hcSNY/ HDHw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.9.1 with SMTP id v1mr11828078oea.130.1360629418866; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:36:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.167.193 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:36:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <61545e6c0a25423f89f8f014199cc240@BL2PR03MB605.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <61545e6c0a25423f89f8f014199cc240@BL2PR03MB605.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:36:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNf2cC07wM2XjKnfWO7Hbxv8=+zM+hSkDWzHydUQXn-rSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8fb203182eba5804d57c39c6"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.46; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f46.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.614, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U53sC-0005om-U3 13d2cee06555b995a8b95baf68ea56ae
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP 2.0 next steps and TLS next protocol negotiation
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNf2cC07wM2XjKnfWO7Hbxv8=+zM+hSkDWzHydUQXn-rSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16581
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

*shrug*
These seem to say the same thing in different words?
-=R


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH) <
Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote:

> The proposed plan (
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JanMar/0577.html)
> for TLS next protocol negotiation in the HTTP/2.0 implementation draft is
> to "use NPN (until TLSWG gives us something to replace it with) for TLS
> connections".
>
> Based on Eric Rescorla's recent message on the TLS mailing list -
> Confirming Consensus: Negotiating upper layer protocols - (
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg09176.html)  which
> states:
>
>         Depending on list discussion and what other proposals appear, we
> may attempt to select a proposal in Orlando.
>
> I'd like to slightly amend the plan to indicate that the initial HTTP/2.0
> implementation draft will use the negotiation proposal selected in Orlando
> by the TLS WG. If none is selected, then we will use NPN (until TLSWG gives
> us something to replace it with) for TLS connections.
>
> Comments?
>
> Brian Raymor
> Senior Program Manager
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email