Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03.txt

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Mon, 11 January 2021 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83EE3A0D74 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:15:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuXU-aStUdux for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B5A3A0D71 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kyxvd-00077L-RX for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:12:17 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:12:17 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kyxvd-00077L-RX@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1kyxvd-00076a-0T for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:12:17 +0000
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1kyxvb-0007G3-4Z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:12:16 +0000
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id b9so25054661ejy.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:12:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S6vlPDa/zt/OhYBvCt9LgryAlrXNb0ePUs614E99/1k=; b=tpsjHYng5QSOqVMKRaeA+hs0Z10J/SEi6nAZZwf6/CT2lbLzEuLrrBCFt1l9uO+Ws3 WlwtlHkoDGfGOV8ZVGODdHPjNjUKGC67lp3UL3JbpAQ2PtmbrRACXvhF1Bno8D/I9DYj ygk7+3PklhHAlpJw4I2ibFIt/9G1xOs1ydM7syJX5yRyLtI7fHYDyOjoEvHqFnk561P5 xF4v2fZ2yQ5heO3kIpIGiqbKOw1fyfnKpP76qwIQi5S2UgMZN42hrBykJy5lIIc8sWST JRTEWMBU1623rAw47T38DIvaEg7I8DBi/cB2luTKRsfw7HpOHda8FY9aLkxG9KHO3mqa FohA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S6vlPDa/zt/OhYBvCt9LgryAlrXNb0ePUs614E99/1k=; b=ad6/eWGp/ffRlrW92WrGNG/5gZQA7Bq6DCTKCmeL4VNwD4v0/pdEDTULWons0qsQ+U 3Sc1g4bK4kS2OqkzzvmptGxrXj38grvVwUCFyEmMXsBSbYkTQ0YINJ3ODie365ceijfC qxEZlXbTg/nkaToyEwsXWU0XZijk82M5x78TsPkbQdVww/NhkHgWeUnnevVXs+JPQX7B u0xwFvtfkNcEid5e0ExHY0NEBVaKmllemrOmBbagtk/TBxm2ibjnyT+88Bn1dnIxScZX 1jc9lAwwvE3hcdQXcqOQPimQ/dKlh1mEP6+L2AIgN7HnvvYHtvuS4nqgnTtd0aSIywgi pubA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wi/lGk1u+mVGoMDkkainT1ELxBjuHgT1AUagNZtR/N52FBoay eSS8ehIQ2eGewPBDFP6DL79InxLI2AZWtcL7kIJFxvma3eU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGlNGRXEmDy83OlPkKC8u6tIKpZVyTSxv6mq2jmBEMhK80kyYZ3sm/b+ZKJH4Q0sAjqzBfGeN7uhC1DLevqW8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1db2:: with SMTP id u18mr11212009ejh.440.1610374323693; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:12:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161037359346.9744.7112864442604747678@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161037359346.9744.7112864442604747678@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:11:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9obA+yWWU9t6b3dzET6xq+wQeZS=cenAgeW309H5LegBug@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000084eacd05b8a07ded"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62e; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1kyxvb-0007G3-4Z ac057a9b9812a45a87b2b7ea55d65578
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9obA+yWWU9t6b3dzET6xq+wQeZS=cenAgeW309H5LegBug@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38367
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Folks,

Kazuho and I have published a new version of the Priority draft.

Notable changes in this one are: an expanded considerations for
prioritisation of server push, and improved language and terminology around
the usage of HTTP/2 PRIORITY_UPDATE (thanks Mike Bishop for input here).
With this version we've reduced the open issues to zero.

I also want to draw attention to the addition of a Priority Parameter
registry. This is an extensible scheme and the document already included
guidance on how to design new extensions. Namely that they should be
designed in a way that does not break expectations around urgency and
incremental parameters should the peer ignore the parameter. The editors
have heard some informal interest in exercising this extension point and we
believe a registry will help us maintain some minimal oversight of new
parameters if they emerge. We've opted for "Registration requests are
reviewed and approved by a Designated Expert, as per [RFC8126], Section
4.5."

Cheers,
Lucas

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:59 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03.txt
To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Lucas Pardue <
lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03.txt
has been successfully submitted by Lucas Pardue and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-httpbis-priority
Revision:       03
Title:          Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP
Document date:  2021-01-11
Group:          httpbis
Pages:          24
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority/
Html:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03.html
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-03

Abstract:
   This document describes a scheme for prioritizing HTTP responses.
   This scheme expresses the priority of each HTTP response using
   absolute values, rather than as a relative relationship between a
   group of HTTP responses.

   This document defines the Priority header field for communicating the
   initial priority in an HTTP version-independent manner, as well as
   HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 frames for reprioritizing the responses.  These
   share a common format structure that is designed to provide future
   extensibility.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat