IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 13 October 2022 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14780C1524DB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.663
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DbyGHm9H9WHw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00901C14CF09 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1oisTi-003bsn-72 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:18:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:18:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1oisTi-003bsn-72@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1oisTh-003bmm-6m for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:18:01 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1oisTf-00C7e4-JS for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:18:00 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1665645464; bh=cujFFxbHknbPBxIDng3NntV766KcL8gcApoCmamn8xI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=N8DVyyFpOMNbg4e0vwYIu1sVCescBL9Nxt9O41+jsxkpPuax8xdG5G8YKEoEBRnbA hINxKf613wjStz5mD+MpIWICGaS485AjnkqYstFd2uqO9rRRYpfJz+6IS1/rB/DcmF Kv4YIb7PpuML3bOJybssfqnjBCbsRBGVw8fLJEv0=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.62.197]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MN5eR-1oPyZx3Fbh-00IyTr; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:17:44 +0200
Message-ID: <a1bdde28-c8e0-e8a9-6658-a80775b75f9e@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:17:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <37AA7568-86A9-4543-845F-EA2DAAA946B1@mnot.net> <74c2c0d9-fe90-7d72-a9bc-16246a18cb0b@gmx.de> <B9DB0DE6-C909-4D66-9273-A824228A7869@mnot.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <B9DB0DE6-C909-4D66-9273-A824228A7869@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:s3kGN3rv4etjeJkEu8Lud+WKuhw/Cby16KUERJgJ/pDCjB5Oy0J qigqQRr+0pd7rioWbVeSlrvkwJZLH1QQOD/k6S5mdAaf7xV9PA/H05f2+6qkSWiCA/TC0mO ig4FVHgimd35qi9CkddJhGPMrUCTHTnojssEnkm1UwTQmRk4Ez7kpqChXKEs/1DNpkDckWE WqW1EDclYgL4A46CJl1Lg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:kBBxD9shhk0=:OHgWutTfHM/V8CL/3bN+2m gykk6dC2C8XlmHacULlcuhkY6Jg79D1ZBuTlpRM10ceWuNZulcFTt4ClIzaF+ap8ZP5Vaago6 J/jPvP4xZB9YJojzsPcRZEOiMlirf3+d+rlRuMhl0LVSAgV6SMzTx8QbsOnkUyG/7XZ4tqvnR ga9zFAjLLUZtDMvticeMYfmKWmYnqMND0mMuOHC79+OvhR44LD9Voe+OEU4ovLcLYTkbsw3lT GLHzkSG52vsmMoF1QoXajU1g507sFzTvH8i8mCvYTuiTNQbXB5kdJL7Gh9LadmsSq9fbyukwo IxxBDVtsOKQNUrr/GHfUfpBydJ1DZSgmzL4VBlU7zOMFKlwAaT4KtpS74IkrSmKkGp2Y6X7kD +cUqG97WHP06Cl4vbzpwDXQBzCFic2LrpdgR03hZ8tQ6Ch7fZ9fbMI7AX04B/LcrpHWyA0DHZ hMSQsjtqkyIDaKkikxBlNMlqouCkzNRibADhzhIv8sdNcbRn+5ciNBfjj80CfxiQK8XZPO1ns 9eAEJlaYoqEqtP1E+8oN7+kEwKzBumlVTTkpYk2iGOfvcMJ7YO4AsIScXK4/adlaFWkLstVdC DZ6+PwNgHE5qzOKOjTwtivDH7Uca7+mY83t+WBnhFdBQ15NSfdhe1aoY6iOzLOP2gtP+HXXNJ qAXM1Vf7J0PEfwIlkiCLIkW7JbTRI+n2khjlpCrhbrCowHP4ofnRh97kVaRbwn6E1ttA12kEc QMQf8En8aL9HI9BbnpJCA6uQj6zjVcrVghHc8a8XdxDFBgTj4UdcXXO0g+C17UalUMNTNrElJ FBD26dJ/vd/R5VgfLx3lPCw6uZMXW+68Io4urOfEuvagNVyu2FAvb0Cl9bTWUge9FGhrsnKIL YReKskL0jibal9Q1rnCQi6+rv6g9W2xG9TW0DoQTwhg9lazfwnBvMtFkv0XKhXmRNbVx0Mjib zxRluPxcRj+i62ZbZEkRmChCnIEmChq4G+vGARYD1vFHSrwZ2BZ1HvZR3DF15ysqcY6G9mPOZ +AxrteKNFbsplnOpQW/6JKPy+00EUIioWSagqFPco6Z9ZWHg+Fjhr/Pl40gcSRdITFD0qD7yo jsZWLMfHzrc+ixgkDF3SYUKqcN+UKfyCwFfKIZsEw+JdlSw3t23RBwsR9HMZvSl4vz3k95eC4 yTr0lZZQ4S/ze0SRq82/aEM8/NocdWCQ0NMyBHCu+Vx+B9GQEvjmBI6jZ1h08SeqQv9YoXKGY D81uah0D+5ysc2xPK44/gA2AZ2J+hZKTsvldKQPzrMVJ7ULmSVV2o5Kz7vUxkKW/cLNk/n512 HT/srCyKz95az0P1jijo7+KM7XvjeZhPxM3F+md1Cd3C6TiitpLE3nM/g3aRLjsJPtSDYZhCq lyg9hKvbOJV9Gt7L5+P0Mep7xmtEG+q8pnB0jctrI5Jp7oUYEn2ivWl2VXb89CR3i0CVBPdOD w22PlFs6RvZG/utVtDqvxd8vLgqV4nJUeuLC1hINO3Pwd0H+rWGPAy76lSTFoo6OQP9XbsJDY 9CdvE+xY5goMNHqNccV1ZmAEUy5d4FmOz0+6qW3B1SvYv
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=julian.reschke@gmx.de domain=gmx.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1oisTf-00C7e4-JS 527e2d80dcac25101d13ebc443e82d02
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Revising Structured Fields: scope
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/a1bdde28-c8e0-e8a9-6658-a80775b75f9e@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40444
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 13.10.2022 um 07:54 schrieb Mark Nottingham:
> Hi Julian,
>
>> On 13 Oct 2022, at 4:42 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> +1 on all points, except for the one about ABNF. The referenced
>> statement is about how to define Structured Fields in other specs; it
>> doesn't really say anything about why the use of ABNF *inside* the SF
>> spec would be a bad idea.
>>
>> FWIW, as implementer of the spec the ABNF made things easier for me; I
>> understand that people who do not use ABNF a lot might feel different.
>> But if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
>
> Now I'm even more concerned -- the spec is explicit that you shouldn't be using the ABNF to implement, you should be using the algorithms.

Define "use". Is reading the ABNF a "use for implementation"?

(and yes, I followed the algorithms in my impl, and it passes the test
suite)

Best regards, Julian

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status