RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A771299B9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:32:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dtfcCVw84Y2V for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC3E21298C6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cZ0bB-0007A0-O4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:29:45 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:29:45 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cZ0bB-0007A0-O4@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1cZ0b0-00078S-IE for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:29:34 +0000
Received: from mail-sn1nam01on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.32.121] helo=NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1cZ0aT-0004RY-7K for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:29:29 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=IiToljvEFvfNuU3FFZyvALqkt7ROKmTA21oUJClxVKE=; b=dySIF6gPLlJI0cF++3lcYaB+CfU3qq36HFbdo6KmAu4JolgJ92pSKCoLAcRAxpyc6NYK4rVFsA953mYOGGEHs3PpxXX4SRzptQ+HKDBsmM6czIpY4sORoIygUJBlT2WXnF1LZevjAP6voj0098wQdL6tTxHJWq/XnmCjNHmk8C0=
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.15) by BN6PR03MB2706.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.860.13; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:28:29 +0000
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) by BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0860.026; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:28:29 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10
Thread-Index: AQHSfEsCoTH86HdOtkeGVYBSxTlfRaFTqn2AgADe/9A=
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:28:28 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB27086FECBFCD15CDD7CC78CD874D0@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABkgnnVBCj3LGNM6UH51okP9TQrxEmJwnXbg62qq9ex3fH-Xog@mail.gmail.com> <05695909-7317-4316-BD18-A2CCE27FF7E8@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <05695909-7317-4316-BD18-A2CCE27FF7E8@mnot.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:9::3b8]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 813e3d69-6b65-4a16-ba07-08d44ad8805a
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081); SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR03MB2706; 7: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR03MB270661F2C741C1B09AAEE4E3874D0@BN6PR03MB2706.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(190756311086443)(120809045254105);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123558025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706;
x-forefront-prvs: 0205EDCD76
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39850400002)(39410400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(24454002)(199003)(51444003)(189002)(377454003)(13464003)(10290500002)(6306002)(99286003)(8990500004)(5660300001)(25786008)(101416001)(2950100002)(10090500001)(3280700002)(105586002)(106116001)(55016002)(230783001)(8676002)(7696004)(106356001)(5005710100001)(68736007)(33656002)(92566002)(86362001)(8936002)(81156014)(81166006)(9686003)(74316002)(2900100001)(4326007)(2906002)(305945005)(50986999)(122556002)(3660700001)(76176999)(39060400001)(7736002)(86612001)(97736004)(38730400001)(54356999)(6506006)(6436002)(5001770100001)(102836003)(229853002)(77096006)(6116002)(53936002)(189998001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2706; H:BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Feb 2017 19:28:28.9820 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR03MB2706
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.47.32.121; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.370, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cZ0aT-0004RY-7K 822d0b2c21150b3eb63c71d351f9132f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BN6PR03MB27086FECBFCD15CDD7CC78CD874D0@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33412
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I would agree that the changes are pretty substantial, both in text and spirit.  A short second WGLC seems like a good idea.  Everyone give it a fresh read (I'll do likewise) and post any feedback to the list.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:08 PM
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>rg>; Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10

I know we're pretty exhausted with this one, but I do observe that the change since WGLC on this one are pretty substantial:
  https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04&url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10

However, Mike is Document Shepherd on this one, so I'll let him make the call as to whether we need another WGLC. Personally, I think if we do have one, a week or so would be sufficient.

Cheers,


> On 1 Feb 2017, at 4:17 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I've just posted an update to this doc:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption/
> 
> This incorporates my best attempt to address the comments Kari had on 
> the last version.  If this is OK, I think that Mark should ask the 
> IESG to publish this as Experimental.
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/