Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 03 March 2015 14:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A541B1A8547 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:06:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mGjdpaKwI6MD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CCBD1A8025 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YSnN6-0003Ei-0x for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:00:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:00:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YSnN6-0003Ei-0x@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YSnMw-0002Qo-Kh for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:00:18 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YSnMq-00078c-OU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:00:18 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.158] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M24Vr-1XeOYt0NMR-00u4Pz; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:59:36 +0100
Message-ID: <54F5BE46.7010106@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:59:34 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <2ACFD2A2-D620-4409-BB2E-D7F8C88CB26C@mnot.net> <54F556C2.3080003@gmx.de> <54F55C40.7030503@treenet.co.nz> <54F5773E.5080909@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <54F5773E.5080909@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gsrT/Sv/f6Go9fvKVluJ4exUAZxajpuridwz+bW5rDzxjL9qtKz 1ZXZLWUiJbGRNBkqNwNgdO9rQfOFNfq+iXBo6wOB2k2qHyzX1DTloqOiKotA2omD05TQ1Zn 7w7f7FH4dVyIacT720vHl8UE2PSwUwToTPJob0WV8WLzKq3MlxMCow9TO5RvJ2S6CRlYShg RS670SM3Hmkf7HOguQtSw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.339, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YSnMq-00078c-OU d71b87ade0cd433fda3e225ce5d4b1e7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54F5BE46.7010106@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28881
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 2015-03-03 09:56, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2015-03-03 08:01, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> On 3/03/2015 7:37 p.m., Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 2015-03-03 03:49, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>> Julian has disposed of all of the issues raised during WGLC, and >>>> there's only one editorial issue left (regarding RFC2119 language). >>> >>> The ones I added in github. Amos, are you ok with the changes I made? >> >> In the new text for section 4 copied from RFC7235: >> >> " >> Hence, in such a configuration, it will appear as if >> Proxy-Authentication-Info is being forwarded because each proxy will >> send the same challenge set. >> " >> >> I'm not sure if "challenge set" is the right words there since this is a >> response header and challenge is request detail. >> Perhapse "header field-value" instead? >> >> Overall it looks good to me, even with the above. >> >> Amos > > Good catch: > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/b1cfbee4c65805839f32e0477848e1f8791cfcad> ...and I have submitted version -03. Best regards, Julian
- draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Mark Nottingham
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Julian Reschke
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Amos Jeffries
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Julian Reschke
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info Julian Reschke