Review wanted for update Caching section on MDN
"block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com" <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2022 06:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE590C14F737 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2022 23:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nS5r1s7qC39Y for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2022 23:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD299C14F734 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2022 23:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1nt1zY-0003wO-82 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 06:56:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 06:56:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1nt1zY-0003wO-82@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from www-data by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com>) id 1nt1zW-0003pt-VG for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 06:56:34 +0000
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com>) id 1ns3Ku-0000xV-F6 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 20 May 2022 14:10:36 +0000
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com>) id 1ns3Kt-00023y-9e for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 20 May 2022 14:10:36 +0000
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id i11so14384019ybq.9 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 20 May 2022 07:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZZLUKfTFmU9D8a2XlPPjpTSfsGJUgJ9TuDXazopbP08=; b=F41UzApNG+UylU0r/4XkBdapLoyG3waitbzWGkX1venJD0hrtzwustg/LrfmccZVu/ 3d4sXfoHevXUXrKYwhu5CPZ3tMqKMyQvjN1rv72GcrrhDdCF30JIy15CZy/0OMF65dMV TzXNGhuUIZKEvYQ5oZvhh97ko07WewcDvfKtkb4kC8CPoK2M7QwueXhkBea9inRJ76jv aP4bST4kb4ipIaJHETbOOCD0widf1jE4MXZW7Qhb9dv+SBOsXuq2Pnl38DREbnHEWf4H 4m/7uNYz/rMShobCW0GX3hUZdC8GTXFN/Mu06oPCqBCz2OTjSXwG56Evz/J4D4qMHXic 2I7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZZLUKfTFmU9D8a2XlPPjpTSfsGJUgJ9TuDXazopbP08=; b=xPEz32QC563xpOIocAgnYUlXVjijbX9o2Dn5I548VY7HLV9Mu7/DTF96ff9MzPCOi7 ZK4JcfuzD/0Yf24L7mDkT3qu9F9C0R+6Av8Fv7kE8i32xOUtL6KV6kQDHmi+LE73iOgP N61UYu9CBA/7r1r+Qx9ylglts8HvHUywk35L5PtXQazlxn7tLayXjLkrS7THYA9xN+9P 0bf4RlaeZIgu9DRMDcLfUAz73zf20yA36/Ex4i+EJDNvUbQUi7PaoOP7PS87qwHmI6ca 1Ep+pLbLHEeCLlka6SRLp1Lz4l7dKBkNp+G4TF/qFSAOjXPKdXoFOr81fTeJOH3bK2Wz lOWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335ovNDRx245M7Laj2nY/Nise1tsGfdsKf9grB48x8L95Nf0MCb f/5rbGylctLikY+yDdhd5oWCPzGnNAnOlb5oSOYvPLjKcKM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtAiHhNf7jgbHhEHGZqMqcqq2XdYapw65Oj7rBOP0YaZ3rKX9kRrpuSECP/Az9/NL9cFDZ5ohP+roNeKLcMOw=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8281:0:b0:64a:caf3:d41b with SMTP id r1-20020a258281000000b0064acaf3d41bmr9477345ybk.194.1653055824030; Fri, 20 May 2022 07:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com" <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 23:10:12 +0900
Message-ID: <CAMaRJ1Otpdt1Y2yMpr5sG5i8Jq8-L8V-W-4t8MQ6km-waM=i9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002f6f3d05df720d20"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c; envelope-from=block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com domain=gmail.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1ns3Kt-00023y-9e 2d1f257d453dd1204500a6f20fa802a3
X-caa-id: 3f48b8da74
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Review wanted for update Caching section on MDN
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMaRJ1Otpdt1Y2yMpr5sG5i8Jq8-L8V-W-4t8MQ6km-waM=i9A@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40034
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hi All I sent a PR for updating the MDN "Caching" section entirely since RFC9111(TBD) is coming soon. It merged only with editorial fix but not enough technical review. https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/16009 (I also updated the "Cache-Control" section too last year, and it was kindly reviewed by mnot, thanks!) What MDN tells is important for every developer, so I hope it is reviewed by spec experts carefully. The MDN content used to be maintained via Wiki and some things were written incorrectly. Now it has moved to Github, so this is good timing to make it "correct". So could someone help me review my PR ? Just leave a comment on PR, replying to this mail or creating new PR/Issues are fine. Thanks Jxck
- Review wanted for update Caching section on MDN block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com