Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 27 March 2015 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABE51A88B1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OuycYoE2eVi2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4921A8823 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YbYTl-0004Dh-9D for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:55:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:55:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YbYTl-0004Dh-9D@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1YbYTe-0004B1-Vu for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:55:27 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1YbYTa-0000Rr-1Z for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:55:26 +0000
Received: by obcjt1 with SMTP id jt1so77166950obc.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eTtVoEOCuEO08Ou98tBYMJlBmQE4Bs3VJa9jVqWNDnQ=; b=fRp7qxCj6OrnOM1+Q8KSuZlLHYyIR30T5bmyGlC624ISlV/qWiIsyGCwcJNkwxTWur WKNAfF+NEy/S83nhwhxEZoyfz5slgC+5dmY50t8MjUGtvxDnSmR+Xmf/oZcGaQbFnPvL 6vz0dAXbNHriV29WndWb84mBCUtKro9Xh0tHgsqC4tOqrYit5pRaAt24R76ZCGjjySfD RbfQpqNsCpu/6K8k4+IlG/cGz8z0M/Yccm6fJI/7hVdRFXQvja6OzSHzIAcMnYy5YJt1 r9i2NDCgCGeedoNpOiw9uhTxNk8hwIDm3E7YgsNNAilXx2lDfbcgT/clEWO9JF4KiUP4 HYcQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.84.40 with SMTP id v8mr17045835oey.80.1427478896056; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.48.151 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXWJLqssidLV6mZW_FxrXALhuJ2gUjZeAj0xxtsUoAZPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F30E70B3-14F0-47F7-8228-98527034A5CC@mnot.net> <emfb77a216-c881-4ccc-b0ac-177521265d55@bodybag> <20150327064939.GA25606@1wt.eu> <CABkgnnXWJLqssidLV6mZW_FxrXALhuJ2gUjZeAj0xxtsUoAZPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:54:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVExSbTx+2zjFkmomOfBouhXRy4pi6wftKVFjKVcJ-DLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.172; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f172.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.897, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YbYTa-0000Rr-1Z ef0f4d530c109e89faf74f9908dd58ec
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVExSbTx+2zjFkmomOfBouhXRy4pi6wftKVFjKVcJ-DLw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29037
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Oh, and I have to apologize for dropping the ball on this one.  It
somehow didn't get recorded as an issue.  I have corrected that:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/57

On 27 March 2015 at 12:53, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 March 2015 at 01:49, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>> I'm fine with several proposals, as long as there's the ALPN name in
>> the header name to indicate that whatever value is advertised must be
>> a valid, registered ALPN token.
>
> Would everyone be OK with the following header field name: "ALPN" ?