Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 28 August 2020 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618FB3A0B95 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=hUl+iBvU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Qr/7hLwD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5QEdVS-z_pKZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9412D3A0B94 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kBdze-0003t8-NH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:00:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:00:34 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kBdze-0003t8-NH@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1kBdzb-0003sN-6n for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:00:31 +0000
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1kBdzY-00013k-JQ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:00:30 +0000
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C78E95; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:00:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:00:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=q YAs/AUPzW3NZdi6Pg0rLSCa90tfMevAW3Se7FB3ZyA=; b=hUl+iBvUZfXh3ILtn tGOnvXkmTYzKgeqBM2UrrOnyvIeb4TSjSVpzhQpchEZ9yDV2NrzGt/4KozyTuKye Q5QMhcd3WC8NWFlXmAftDFzvfupTt89dYcgzrutztKgXTNxJ7Sx2ozxUmrlNpHUM wO3xXqTQYrrEXxcWNnrbz3pHGrUGajBDxVy4U0CQqJpzsRY10YJWfhelr0kY6ADX LIlV54jFz1VXSWpQZsXYAnhXD/AcuTwKsyGYsoQ+N4hKCo8E0dcM3daOKQ1PGl+h MRzL/iOSJQPTT2HJUr2JTNFvVlFbaa9P0lnMKTBKW92MAVRpU73tgjo/+mhvyeoM a1u6Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=qYAs/AUPzW3NZdi6Pg0rLSCa90tfMevAW3Se7FB3Z yA=; b=Qr/7hLwDlDnawr1Z3V2/aQwMtbKe4Mt7BdIAZvqiaDIeB0Ii6ev3ot+LD uDL6G6juDzXL6vwmFLLEqLr2vJw7cv9BlQxR5ca45i3E1DielkSovQlfSIIquSk6 Rt1l3hOwl99Tfoa4xAMqumHHUf0/jx1nZpkUVDVcs530srhyePyretlwKuxdLlXg hwLOnPSaBXPDgG21G4MRWcody9u7Kx0WTtV4FX1D6yZfsbNoNA0mtRepkgKcKvHy ef9i6ujXavnU61zwqGWrH1l4uCAXdUi8q8VORCEzxrC8m6Z6fJI5p9xJ6Ftyhd0J 6Cy5KZUs6u7qWxum/udeeBh6IHoTw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2f9IX9cMQcQBr6iqthgh5g1oMlKHWfiWBswpzhfY2NzpO7q9KBfcVQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedruddvjedgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeehueffgeevhefgveeukefhieekuddtudejvefgfffggeeiffeiffeiudeftedv heenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpmhhnohhtrd hnvghtnecukfhppeduudelrddujedrudehkedrvdehudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2f9IX7O9ZZHKWT4lwFfvDw1OWuHi3RLmljf4mI3NuaD_It18jKnDvQ> <xmx:2f9IX2jvJGNd2bnupDrAEXdnyroF51n_BZb-itdls3OMr6qmJa5O7A> <xmx:2f9IX2_LlI7WuTwk9PcQw5iPRrlrb_5JN3s-rOZ2XuORKPq-g-bd5A> <xmx:2_9IX6U16j6PO8VvtiyWECGrjMNNCMwG1Q-AAvTPblbUUU8QsiIONw>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A353530605C8; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:00:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4facac0f-867d-4947-840c-fcd675a09d51@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:00:05 +1000
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <19ED7610-A661-4E96-B25A-352109DFFFCD@mnot.net>
References: <4facac0f-867d-4947-840c-fcd675a09d51@www.fastmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.20; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1kBdzY-00013k-JQ 249802a8c53e4ff8e0e1b162b096bbba
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/19ED7610-A661-4E96-B25A-352109DFFFCD@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37970
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Martin,

Just my personal .02 - this seems reasonable, as do the suggestions for folding in other subsequent changes.

What about priorities?

Cheers,


> On 28 Aug 2020, at 5:15 pm, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> 
> All this tiresome talk about terminology got me thinking about the value of action over words.
> 
> So, I present to you a proposed update to RFC 7540:
> 
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00
> 
> This only does:
> 
> * removes unnecessarily divisive terminology
> * rolls up errata
> 
> Obviously, there is a long and slippery slope of things that we might do from this point.  However, I think that it would be good if we could just publish a minimal update without getting embroiled in difficult and time-consuming design questions.
> 
> The diff is mostly just stuff that xml2rfc does differently five years on:
> 
>  https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc7540.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00.txt
> 
> Or you can peruse the individual changes I made:
> 
>  https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/compare/master...martinthomson:main
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/