Re: p1: Via and gateways

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Sat, 20 April 2013 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBA921F8EB9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nPHzGYpltw59 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBA721F8EB7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTRDV-0001JY-Om for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:24:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:24:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTRDV-0001JY-Om@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1UTRDS-0001Ii-LD for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:24:06 +0000
Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1UTRDO-0000Ae-VO for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:24:06 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r3K6Ndl7028473; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:23:39 +0200
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:23:39 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130420062339.GC26517@1wt.eu>
References: <F7810D5C-45A6-4D01-83ED-2A9AB5856813@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F7810D5C-45A6-4D01-83ED-2A9AB5856813@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.709, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.702, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UTRDO-0000Ae-VO c2f7957f9881b8cc6e7e1b5e30ee5e76
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p1: Via and gateways
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20130420062339.GC26517@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17382
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 02:07:11PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> p1 Section 2.3 says:
> 
> > However, an HTTP-to-HTTP gateway that wishes to interoperate with third-party HTTP servers must conform to HTTP user agent requirements on the gateway's inbound connection and must implement the Connection (Section 6.1) and Via (Section 5.7.1) header fields for both connections.
> 
> This means that accelerators and CDNs MUST generate a Via header on the outbound connection. This isn't widely practiced, and I'm not sure it's necessary. Comments?

I know no load-balancer which does it anyway. Especially in hosted
environments where it is desired that the infrastructure is as much
transparent to the hosted servers as possible.

I must say I never understood the rationale behind Via because for
incoming traffic we don't care and for outgoing traffic we don't
want to disclose to the world our inside details.

Another example of a MUST which makes people think that MUSTs are at user
option I think.

Willy