Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540

Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> Fri, 20 January 2017 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8414C1294C3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:41:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJctnVw-KEup for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B4C129AF1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cUZPJ-0003PZ-Iz for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:39:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:39:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cUZPJ-0003PZ-Iz@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1cUZPG-0003Nz-DS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:39:06 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1cUZPA-0002JS-G8 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:39:01 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c206so43940875wme.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:38:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=pX8wzC5lmk531yYVT345mSXIPrqZEsxdYqgtjz1U5ks=; b=aM99Pf/LKo7+n8vUSxfx6apJfLzdwXDyCxDYsAckfcGD1Xpid7K54sWZYY/2srAKnG onMY9Z2vS86YdiguaUs9t89GWNL3wkUhjOHKhf5MimGXQGiSIbMgliV1y79cG+fwU00S /zvtMycHuHAYmcI7w8140c8edWpztOqni8+gMgE0Y2KtrO2g4tMNeLV9sOZAnB3e63JU 4xwzuTV/pZvuKm2TUbTfSSSn/k6oqyRFCe1nUrl3oCf8v+0bOYzYyy3o8RGiiPixIsrC 7FJXtdkjryYDkNhYzPZZa6yyci7LDpS7l0PKbJD3zTs7nNDsHkoEMJS2vjG1zXHF3Adg MT8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=pX8wzC5lmk531yYVT345mSXIPrqZEsxdYqgtjz1U5ks=; b=hAP4yhgon2dxgmEcjE1jGoxmajYXF7BYZ/uYwqnR3C5J4REE35X21EeReuBe3YYskv oDdY+yfVLbKjXIA8rgV7+a7a4dCFDSucyQzifvk3nrzJOQe03Wh+inOFd+OetUg3UaVk avmqE1hfvjU76w68reCOu+JCBSJDkoa5FtqrxiIXm+HS3TsGb0rd4PDqOHTdMSOYuOEi re5cG+yRqqR4x1aU2j4dL7oC/ZjtXVYSb54tvwtCalNsAhspr8OqQ8V66/Cl9an3xf8E XEGwyGwcUgGWPsQg0uOuYRj/rdyL9RZF4FgEwJn1NGUrLptgaMXobTisel47Ch10RRbz Aegg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLHFINQd6/P1MOJjw+QcKDCO1M+UYaVvYHqZCGOlS41PcfxYR+0azk+3eO57wLKZg==
X-Received: by 10.223.151.18 with SMTP id r18mr11448494wrb.129.1484919513346; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:38:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (227.71.125.91.dyn.plus.net. [91.125.71.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d29sm6156732wmi.19.2017.01.20.05.38.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV4FG01J5CwdjG_gnCWvoyaT80ZBd3R41TopuWuKEAm5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:38:30 +0000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B92DD569-DB7D-4952-B745-F5D91C3F6B02@lukasa.co.uk>
References: <CABkgnnV4FG01J5CwdjG_gnCWvoyaT80ZBd3R41TopuWuKEAm5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.50; envelope-from=cory@lukasa.co.uk; helo=mail-wm0-f50.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.157, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cUZPA-0002JS-G8 5c7ec983775b0b965e285427bb35eb19
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/B92DD569-DB7D-4952-B745-F5D91C3F6B02@lukasa.co.uk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33344
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 20 Jan 2017, at 03:59, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think that we only really need one piece of clarification (the
> second would be enough), but it doesn't hurt to make it clear in both
> places that one might go to learn this.

Agreed. I’m happy with both proposed texts.