Re: Client-Cert Header draft

James <james.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 22 April 2020 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E627E3A0E28 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 06:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xc7jAFKKkjOC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 06:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E96523A0CE0 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 06:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1jRFpM-0003aG-64 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:54:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:54:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1jRFpM-0003aG-64@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from www-data by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <james.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1jRFpL-0003XI-2v for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:54:11 +0000
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <james.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1jREvp-0000th-4s for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:56:49 +0000
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <james.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1jREvn-0008W7-Ej for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:56:49 +0000
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id z6so2240766wml.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 05:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IHNDx3MBoD+hO911hmmWDk6J18ujLBEFTnPNDNENcAU=; b=sfM89klneXeLt6Ml5zslViSV3L/TG3cUlLH2uy9onnsomdVpLnXQxs9aN4DKt4MuxP ao7Q2YWZ3VO/Io1VMkSNP8th6Gs2yKEiACRhfcqWWpBTjY9WpGYWJdobxxZOoZapN0EK OvoqNChSczhAgapXLHHHpAhbVSM3qXxDDL5X4k91KAr+N8lfmUPR/zTdIYH7OMretYI8 PIxQgLDacLIt3Uf/Tp13kNUicYNT01oPrCeUeWt3BiWq2AZNrTKnIsvVrYpxMHvd2hqD QOnxhJGwQqqMm/iaL6nkmlNFjprqIuvvYDlvlPSVnP+ROdCUANnZlhrKrAPEVAYDWqk8 fNiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IHNDx3MBoD+hO911hmmWDk6J18ujLBEFTnPNDNENcAU=; b=X+bcLlpqK23Vx4AQKx2ZQi/u81QRkzYsZzCm0cMfIGwtwfV7s+xVqQAg8ke52GzuhR 7vnqzawo1inidQYTzvDIp49f0tm1L6nhRe9wwNtZw1PjWQSs2l6Zg+I2UPuJb3TTDDi/ mToYf/UVbjzpKQmLI3J8onswxJklJ8k/x1VZUrOCzqLylRTBwc5Zzni3GpG+3Q95kJbe I1t8IpAm4fyZ8/aLF/glPDpxXQacdZikdUHcuiqA1/wKVhXOdqhjE80ogcuHr24zHqpg 4uGAC8QQhEfHOc6h4ZvuUqD8Wj31CsmPKQNJl6ESfWQSnAPRTZAfQpmNEo/cRoojx/Q0 2zyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubNxC0JeQ7vj09gjRRHwCqXI0YFoy0D/AduER2LJQQnF84m1q2e VVXvNOPO09vCzeoC9jJ5jQuAIRkY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIjm7dmP91iEIceAJENTEu7EdUOoiE2nQG3zhAmkyO31IgyV27WtP7hhy+b7m6COox4AYcltQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4b0a:: with SMTP id y10mr10136557wma.24.1587560195778; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 05:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:c7f:60b:e000:c141:7bd:641c:f931? ([2a02:c7f:60b:e000:c141:7bd:641c:f931]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm8356146wro.59.2020.04.22.05.56.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 05:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm>, Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <CA+k3eCRQhuS9TyEVdF6ZAfLSyPngjDLvctUTc++2Ok+RJmw0qA@mail.gmail.com> <5AC09590-1978-4EAB-B5D9-B8E126ED839C@sharp.fm>
From: James <james.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e5438ea3-ceae-ef96-f568-b88ed4b19f16@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:56:34 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:76.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/76.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5AC09590-1978-4EAB-B5D9-B8E126ED839C@sharp.fm>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32c; envelope-from=james.ietf@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32c.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1jREvn-0008W7-Ej 4158c4e6cb69c377e4babbc1e5af2d30
X-caa-id: 30e9c6b9fe
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Client-Cert Header draft
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/e5438ea3-ceae-ef96-f568-b88ed4b19f16@gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37540
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 21/04/2020 23:17, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Having read the draft, one thing I would suggest is that the ability 
> exists for the contents of the Client-Cert header to be signed, so that 
> anyone who cares can verify that the header came from where it said it 
> came from ... (I wouldn’t make this a MUST requirement, but maybe  > RECOMMENDED perhaps).

+1 for it not being a MUST as I think that signing the header should 
only be RECOMMENDED or SHOULD be present when the TRRP to Origin 
connection is NOT using TLS itself. Perhaps this could be offered as a 
separate header itself. The draft appears to focus around no TLS being 
used from TRRP to Origin, I have uses cases where it exists - such as a 
publicly trusted CA used on the TRRP's server certificate, but an 
internal CA used to the Origin.

- J