IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A structured format for dates?

Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Tue, 21 June 2022 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB91C13A24B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-U362kMytg6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C922CC15D88A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1o3YKC-00036a-MH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:24 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:24 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1o3YKC-00036a-MH@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>) id 1o3YKA-00035H-KQ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:22 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>) id 1o3YKA-001iVn-07 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:22 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4CF289298; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 25L7T7lX017652 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:07 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: (from phk@localhost) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 25L7T62R017651; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:06 GMT (envelope-from phk)
Message-Id: <202206210729.25L7T62R017651@critter.freebsd.dk>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-reply-to: <5CE5343D-EECB-4F25-A3DB-F300E7708656@mnot.net>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <8C9C4A5C-45DB-43C0-9769-2A7510854AB1@mnot.net> <5CE5343D-EECB-4F25-A3DB-F300E7708656@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <17649.1655796546.1@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:29:06 +0000
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@critter.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1o3YKA-001iVn-07 6bc0d88c02af6bac2fbf369af5a2fa92
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: A structured format for dates?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/202206210729.25L7T62R017651@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40198
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

--------
Mark Nottingham writes:
> Just a heads-up:
>
> I've linked a PR from the issue, to give people an idea of one way this might look.

I've commented in the issue, but the Tl;dr:

You have written it to preclude 00:00:60Z timestamps, which puts textual and sf-decimal
representation on feature-parity.  Therefore we should pick the simpler sf-decimal.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email