Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 28 August 2020 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8FA3A090C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nOj14xQdqgUS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F163A0901 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kBcvy-0006TC-1l for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:52:42 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:52:42 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kBcvy-0006TC-1l@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kBcvw-0006SL-Io for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:52:40 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kBcvu-0007Hg-Dn for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:52:40 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1598615545; bh=Kf+U2PIbetSNKXZroMM61CfzxR5CfddY9TkG8p/Qjns=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WulZTUJFpZOK73tR+gem5QD/1WCs6oNZIKxQ6nB08x3uuJajNwuvupsQ8lgXwqXpe bXNO8OmT+lg+ll++zWP/2N2x+FxMsz555HO7NHhsQ9FVho0jzDD7QxPiBO8iMOH3/t C1zTyPr62Um68uJ9MjjtW76/eksegGs9TGeGzgZg=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.236] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MNKlu-1jwiP52CoU-00OrwT for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:52:25 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <4facac0f-867d-4947-840c-fcd675a09d51@www.fastmail.com> <785148de-dd24-6446-2430-759d580a8984@gmx.de> <20200828112708.GA29305@1wt.eu>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <58a95c23-4619-41df-f03f-4ace670d551b@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:52:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200828112708.GA29305@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:oKAcvNkOFfsMD2lJ8jH6cNLtHjGfn+Aszhlz9F4LUZRDgsXi75x ACWOx5Mfau/uv9u6dyRH48H8IPwr1oivcbE8JU526P/PYP5wSGBhboZWNr/8MhoTPyHzuiQ EKiq0DeQJTyRXBpmtyHcpHqTZH78fwlVYlsn5ephMa/Lv0fvNouljuvuXYk8sRi+JvZV/AT CrujRIAysqjfh5FTeLadQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:cy137aIumyM=:86VV4QBYMGmsmE9ekPveSC eKOVubI5YnWOGfjLhZ5/F+o3ocLMVRQCJnG6g1y9przPU/yf6O+N5+rSt/hKrPuELsRd8l7nW Zhu07w4bYPu6T2THqo3FHN4kHzglpCV6cwjvSU58hpgZ82SX6qiXxRKjPFiQ9QIWKG0pd8k3W lKrXbVAM0+XtsHQTMMZ8VhkQjLp5IhX/1fddZ+XmojyqStp0xZBJ5NhD6EuedNDaXaoNXDk3Y QOWGvGRI+5FNt6C7/u7LjEm24CJ8k0DvWdD8/JZwPCczBqWLt0+ca14pA9uv0JiBPQSlHXdRs XgUsI+BlOvwL+iA/PnH4EvjZhSjKDiSzWHeUKcI/svGqSzJsKvVktOxOI8c+Af5FfvmT6KBy9 VM5rlnt8Z5p6ZA0CsZYH29FTr2rIeUzFvb8gZJTc/1GufRrv7YfAkUl9pNfOhi+EkhR7D+haL LW43NhVZDyfWLs64G5LKwZ9O9dCaLhRkWgXpOeTuHaLkOu66V2QwrYkp14MNmgEnr9YE0knsc pvzOMb6gqS+q33+xsXXlScWJaCufMgqiXAkd341TjsozmX7779cD9eVzRgrDDIrOeNNWoWYwA nHQ3OLjfuc6/cFiLA5DzBlOUoCA5rIerBfj0Ngn6V6bp7tiDbNIpEy+3+dwim7mSPaq9QffF7 7JbJQ4KpvrGIDGy5ym1dC8wFkmvU5a0/DI/jWA/kaU2oL51+gqbE8ocySn2BFBJWiUWqpDPU6 OQBAtTX1yk50jsik2hEWGlVJ6jtAbM1mowYTLlbJqHoFMzkIN2iak7otM4N8MI+nfMCQXOFef 6nti8WWgqTNk6j9wzwWc3eSUgcUiOOoQQbk2PQEDdbaxcvQmPgCxLZWj3YHFItGz9RuUlavTs IRgUsVb/YuUEEe50X+cfEMC/hBurmbvwwovp6rWgCHqsRQ9BOraqO4gtdUX35q8zreZy/xUon 1kvHgsdmxP+ePRtURSrTgFzEQmtcwwo3XMkgOVfEUy3mMoIh20idd57FCGkndMwp+1Y7RQChS AhOi1sgKHr5DcpW3klR9Z62vPrriV47zPXQ7gqXwFkXEEqxgDwHeZKu6XTUAlhMUj0v0kSbhs 7skTYbymnlIXz7Y3vmi1dInzsLuquzULU62o92ECnNRSR6nO8bsUWsKVu3kIe9EpBNCacak7G 6M9+f9p2RC9jNoetbQdk0m06Mbxcsv2s7VyrypmBXV3H9yU7M9A3aL8nZzOofqsY1oozWuhI9 um6XVIt+k6XuRSh5YqTug3DSa/6XwLK0lm+b+Jw==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.809, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1kBcvu-0007Hg-Dn 6e8611eb6e9a7d659dd77cd93deb027d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/58a95c23-4619-41df-f03f-4ace670d551b@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37968
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 28.08.2020 um 13:27 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:59:03PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Am 28.08.2020 um 09:15 schrieb Martin Thomson:
>>> All this tiresome talk about terminology got me thinking about the value of action over words.
>>>
>>> So, I present to you a proposed update to RFC 7540:
>>>
>>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00
>>>
>>> This only does:
>>>
>>> * removes unnecessarily divisive terminology
>>> * rolls up errata
>>>
>>> Obviously, there is a long and slippery slope of things that we might do from this point.  However, I think that it would be good if we could just publish a minimal update without getting embroiled in difficult and time-consuming design questions.
>>>
>>> The diff is mostly just stuff that xml2rfc does differently five years on:
>>>
>>>     https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc7540.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00.txt
>>>
>>> Or you can peruse the individual changes I made:
>>>
>>>     https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/compare/master...martinthomson:main
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Actually, I was going to suggest that as well, but mainly to align
>> HTTP/2 with the new core specs - it would be good to say how the cleanup
>> affects the references from HTTP/2.
>
> +1 as well. Wouldn't it be an opportunity to also reference (or even merge)
> the extensions such as RFC8441 which adds the ":protocol" pseudo-header ?

And it probably should include RFC 8740 ("Using TLS 1.3 with HTTP/2")...

Best regards, Julian