Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 11 October 2016 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDAA129589 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xz8y_yWNWmXm for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C10C31294E0 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1btuPp-0004ec-Hk for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:36:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:36:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1btuPp-0004ec-Hk@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1btuPk-0004dU-Ce for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:36:04 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1btuPW-0001ze-Nh for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:36:01 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.197] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lomql-1bEpQZ1jzf-00gqoP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:35:12 +0200
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
References: <147614675047.31404.6416168532325888959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161011035143.EF7DF13664@welho-filter2.welho.com> <42B9174B-2A49-4E21-B607-E60D05952561@mnot.net> <CAKXHy=f=tNi5mft02y_rhg9tbP8J5wDLSR1=MmJeys+7tUWC0A@mail.gmail.com> <4dbd894c-4389-a246-8a75-16a103f5858e@gmx.de> <CAKXHy=fXPVXJ_-EkjCY2n1MD7-hRoXQb63zsJY8pGruGqe+N2Q@mail.gmail.com> <637ed84c-06c9-5d4c-3c7d-0bf6fff606bc@gmx.de> <CAKXHy=eLCJ=qpzNZknGO0obkK2c2H3pcvRrtM-0D53FXxW2CYw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <7015b249-7b75-31d2-17ad-5ac46c2b4505@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:35:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHy=eLCJ=qpzNZknGO0obkK2c2H3pcvRrtM-0D53FXxW2CYw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bl3eHS3jyrXq0i4/XSP6U3ftk+HlnzKDGHNBwQsN5gxwJj5mAd3 8WXtEHubaT882k4IK+Ht+x7MeRAQdaSfjdMEIrZGwmsy81rRefwIEmpCO3sjdqZkK4qC/g/ jbqJHoV9fdAYYHW/l9+cKl9tHVJLKGJADBgmcQQCG20hQY5oTJSbg/k9feuNx9LbVj/rHra Ze6DYHiGQ8qe8RPZIPHEA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:k30JoWrqM88=:ELIykJ0DjITzvqvHTR/GGh rr0vdJ0LSY9nSeZdHKQMpfbMQEmvs/O0Bzcrcfq17LSg5sXaRiKfUnpqjcsHDSfNravf11Cek tE66LoZ3sBAK5+ECCK+rZzWlkLJuK0ixARt+ksFpoV/XuHbqn8aJucIC9pZY79Bcm4AGYK0fq CCa1eme5Eit+dAMQ2kAfrjqLMJflSz3C8+3m4S0mZA18g2TPYSGp3ghjZmVgxsikBB7qNYj32 NON6IebLh0NjjMxV/3UZ9FjTuwEyyzvtUzT+rfkakSnI4hwDh+sqDpqfoFhkhvLUHErj8Mu5Z 1pXm5m7YcqyKRW1LAHGCnJ3xq6irhh/VSXfwdpiPI63BD7cykE4TXiUa5SkGnBpYpyico+I5J KcT/PcpEoenqaZ+8cV0hhnaT9Dnl0uqRzUbY64QwR+e/dZso4583sh+oo+h8u/tqESTBXQI0B dnRNpLjyTDAVGeF73/bmpfW/p5uh66UcXbvMvY0xlRDVioJu4wnT2MF+DTX1clDh9KubNysBX 4Ut8TdsreflHQY+6ugQ5CsMTM//GtfEp/nUe0+KDVbpatJtTj04D/U5fcKFDn7LsZTbofGiq0 pNbf1XdVyO96OQKiKPgqUz3m1oswycEEznjoc/6FPVzJrmue/vnXGgtJqud8eQW6gQI3Oy5ZM 4r9NzG2eGBhgux3Baq+2RxDskMQfkvxRxwrmjJ6VNWvLP4rVIpwv6uZhiENlmExYi0QBzG3nj DVvW7fmQt9A9KiLqCGy4ZhlpikcjqT8bhVFCMFLvEZRNDwlPe3DxGXv/i9WSVsmFwp4LGghvw 3uhagMX
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.183, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1btuPW-0001ze-Nh 9beaf9b753d6681cc1d60e7d32e07baa
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/7015b249-7b75-31d2-17ad-5ac46c2b4505@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32560
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-10-11 11:57, Mike West wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de
> <mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de>> wrote:
>
>     On 2016-10-11 11:44, Mike West wrote:
>
>         ...
>         I made this change because of a lint warning that the
>         `sane-cookie-date`
>         definition in the same block was too long. What's a reasonable
>         way of
>         marking both of these up consistently without overflowing the
>         allotted
>         width?
>         ...
>
>
>     This:
>
>         -sane-cookie-date  = rfc1123-date
>         -                      ; defined in [RFC2616], Section 3.3.1
>         +sane-cookie-date  =
>         +   <rfc1123-date, defined in [RFC2616], Section 3.3.1>
>
>
> SGTM, thanks.
>
> What about `domain-value` below: should we change that to something like
> `<subdomain, defined in ...>` as well? It doesn't look like line-breaks
> are valid inside `<...>`, so maybe the comments are the right option?
>
> -mike

Oh, I missed that one.

Right, line breaks in prose productions aren't allowed, so this is the 
only option. It may thus make sense to use that notation consistently...