p1: Via and gateways
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sat, 20 April 2013 04:08 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0B421F91AB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1+CQIS+QANJV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A693A21F9193 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UTP5Q-0004y7-0a for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 04:07:40 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 04:07:40 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UTP5Q-0004y7-0a@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UTP5M-0004xR-VS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 04:07:36 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UTP5M-0005m1-9a for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 04:07:36 +0000
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.190.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85065509B5 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:07:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F7810D5C-45A6-4D01-83ED-2A9AB5856813@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:07:11 +1000
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UTP5M-0005m1-9a 269cb8c245b9d1651b34c2078be4e404
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: p1: Via and gateways
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/F7810D5C-45A6-4D01-83ED-2A9AB5856813@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17371
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
p1 Section 2.3 says: > However, an HTTP-to-HTTP gateway that wishes to interoperate with third-party HTTP servers must conform to HTTP user agent requirements on the gateway's inbound connection and must implement the Connection (Section 6.1) and Via (Section 5.7.1) header fields for both connections. This means that accelerators and CDNs MUST generate a Via header on the outbound connection. This isn't widely practiced, and I'm not sure it's necessary. Comments? -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Mark Nottingham
- p1: Via and gateways Mark Nottingham
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Willy Tarreau
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Mark Nottingham
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Roberto Peon
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Willy Tarreau
- Re: p1: Via and gateways David Morris
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Willy Tarreau
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Mark Nottingham
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Willy Tarreau
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Amos Jeffries
- Re: p1: Via and gateways David Morris
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Amos Jeffries
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Willy Tarreau
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Amos Jeffries
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Amos Jeffries
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Mark Nottingham
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Willy Tarreau
- Re: p1: Via and gateways Mark Nottingham