Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 11 October 2016 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46719128B37 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UzKxjU6CrGeX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB241295CA for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1btoGz-0006jj-Cp for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:02:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:02:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1btoGz-0006jj-Cp@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1btoGs-0006ip-A4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:02:30 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1btoGo-0002JY-LA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:02:28 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EBF322E253; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:02:04 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161011035143.EF7DF13664@welho-filter2.welho.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:02:03 +1100
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <42B9174B-2A49-4E21-B607-E60D05952561@mnot.net>
References: <147614675047.31404.6416168532325888959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161011035143.EF7DF13664@welho-filter2.welho.com>
To: Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3226)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.351, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1btoGo-0002JY-LA 35380b1ee89f4b361cb80124a622e2d6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/42B9174B-2A49-4E21-B607-E60D05952561@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32547
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Kari,

The best thing to do here is to file an issue, so it doesn't get lost; if you don't have a github account, tell me and I'll file it for you.

Cheers,


> On 11 Oct. 2016, at 2:51 pm, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00
> 
> 
> Looking
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc6265&url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00
> 
> 5.1.3.  Domain Matching
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00#section-5.1.3
> 
> There is some nested lists lost.
> 
> |   o  The domain string and the string are identical.  (Note that both
> |      the domain string and the string will have been canonicalized to
> |      lower case at this point.)
> |   o  All of the following conditions hold:
> |   o  The domain string is a suffix of the string.
> |   o  The last character of the string that is not included in the
> |      domain string is a %x2E (".") character.
> |   o  The string is a host name (i.e., not an IP address
> 
> These should be on nested list, I think:
> 
> |   o  The domain string is a suffix of the string.
> |   o  The last character of the string that is not included in the
> |      domain string is a %x2E (".") character.
> |   o  The string is a host name (i.e., not an IP address
> 
> 
> RFC 6265 was
> 
> 5.1.3.  Domain Matching
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-5.1.3
> 
> 
> |   o  The domain string and the string are identical.  (Note that both
> |      the domain string and the string will have been canonicalized to
> |      lower case at this point.)
> |
> |   o  All of the following conditions hold:
> |
> |      *  The domain string is a suffix of the string.
> |
> |      *  The last character of the string that is not included in the
> |         domain string is a %x2E (".") character.
> |
> |      *  The string is a host name (i.e., not an IP address).
> 
> 
> / Kari Hurtta
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/