Re: #469: definition of "private"
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 07 May 2013 18:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E3E21F9467 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFCimhYvntRx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E1821F942D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UZmE8-0001Pj-C3 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 18:03:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 18:03:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UZmE8-0001Pj-C3@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UZmDy-0001Oz-8i for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 18:02:50 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UZmDw-0007Dp-V1 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 18:02:50 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z12so911761wgg.23 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 07 May 2013 11:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JbjHH+PRUrLCBM5RuFy1IQGHOFaCuLJCCa4gBjHuj18=; b=VWtoZLQWaljBzDtz/LVTLDMEio3p8SobSXL2X95Bk70PWYL4gY3xFye9BFdjK5bCdI RjjUWdoxVimH6catzNKQAfMvBvFqDVfMOUHVJ3jFnMuOekWO8NWuw+gZpuyxsqAeRJLQ c0f8jkoHtZQPgN34e11DPM1y42VnZZlGZQV1/MmwbEtNrLI/KSl1pZSZg5GrnUVvw45g lIZWuB+5YZhqj+QuOfETYby0P1ytJUGqSxe9AmUVtBpN7OVo9WBoSs1SxRCGZtPSXYd7 GhGBtMvlMKWouL9YctkwZGZ7OEYf7DNkL7ic3PSJD1upfmiG0fF59Ah9vW0Ul1A8eL1R oNaQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.198.49 with SMTP id iz17mr16598229wic.19.1367949742741; Tue, 07 May 2013 11:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 11:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3FC21BBE-DCDB-4332-9851-B19D1AF70EC1@mnot.net>
References: <3FC21BBE-DCDB-4332-9851-B19D1AF70EC1@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 11:02:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUFv386gf7R2k5rZ+bhS3D3tqh4jc65vC031vPuEODVWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.44; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.662, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UZmDw-0007Dp-V1 c1a5778f520633a19c3eaa790c1d2256
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #469: definition of "private"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnUFv386gf7R2k5rZ+bhS3D3tqh4jc65vC031vPuEODVWg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17867
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
This is good. On 7 May 2013 00:16, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Just finishing up on this editorial issue - one of the bits of feedback I gave was: > >> 1.2 "private cache" is defined as being "dedicated to a single user." I suspect this should be "... single user agent" to be in keeping with our separation from user concerns. > > Any issue with making that change? > > Regards, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > >
- Re: #469: definition of "private" Martin Thomson
- #469: definition of "private" Mark Nottingham
- Re: #469: definition of "private" David Morris
- Re: #469: definition of "private" Martin Thomson
- Re: #469: definition of "private" David Morris
- Re: #469: definition of "private" Mark Nottingham