Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 18 August 2016 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433EB12D888 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIdz9VqI_U7b for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063D212D884 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1baJJB-0007tO-8M for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:08:17 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:08:17 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1baJJB-0007tO-8M@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>) id 1baJJ2-0007sR-Dp for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:08:08 +0000
Received: from waldorf.isode.com ([62.232.206.188]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>) id 1baJIw-0002Nu-U3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:08:06 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1471511256; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=CzxK4SEtzqicvtTcNuu5ARpRDh0VPBzd4iCM5gbPgdM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=MFaSb8gsE0dN/uSHcntawM+EarLM/fVb8fivBfy1CY875Gv40ADm8WOeK4Gvnz0+VVzBon tSjtDgW5plStvlu3TKpOn/ySZzKQL9Ur5vsn6nXGQ4NS7iyqswJsTDWH/AiACBetdR4FIM RFpN0T8Np6IGgE/cjYvPryZSfOOV5g4=;
Received: from [172.20.1.74] (dhcp-74.isode.net [172.20.1.74]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <V7V61wBODFBq@waldorf.isode.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:07:36 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13G35)
In-Reply-To: <98a34e2a-3840-75a8-4c70-1551a693cca0@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:19:22 +0100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <A6759F3D-1258-45ED-9DA5-1091334C5E30@isode.com>
References: <20160413160504.63AB6180006@rfc-editor.org> <BC8FFB7E-CAC0-4BA2-958D-6256B20AA2F0@mnot.net> <98a34e2a-3840-75a8-4c70-1551a693cca0@measurement-factory.com>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.232.206.188; envelope-from=alexey.melnikov@isode.com; helo=waldorf.isode.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.393, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1baJIw-0002Nu-U3 57ffa45912a4b87a935b5b02a17b671b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4667)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/A6759F3D-1258-45ED-9DA5-1091334C5E30@isode.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32309
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

> On 18 Aug 2016, at 00:43, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 04/19/2016 12:18 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> 
>> I *think* we've come to a place where there's agreement on accepting
>> the errata, but with BWS replacing OWS throughout; i.e.:
> 
>> chunk-ext      = *( BWS  ";" BWS chunk-ext-name [ BWS  "=" BWS chunk-ext-val ] )
> 
>> Everyone OK with that?
> 
> There were no objections and two OKs (including mine).
> 
> 
>> If so -- Alexey, can we just annotate the errata with that when it's
>> accepted, or should this one be rejected and a new (smaller and
>> correct from the start) one be filed?
> 
> It looks like this thread got stuck after that question and the errata
> entry is still in the "Reported" state. I have just witnessed a yet
> another developer being confused by this invisible syntax change. Mark,
> could you please push this fix forward somehow?

Can you please send me how you would like the erratum to look like, containing 3 parts: old text, new text and comments? Then I will get it fixed.

Thank you,
Alexey