Re: Frame size errors
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 24 September 2014 04:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AA01A8A7F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id prhVunvnCHPS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC8EB1A8A7D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XWeYE-0002tc-BD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:51:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:51:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XWeYE-0002tc-BD@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XWeXf-0002sh-5u for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:51:03 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XWeXe-0004gL-5k for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 04:51:03 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z11so4648147lbi.29 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NmOtVIin8z/IVWDQHcobQN438+HK5yiUzp3ndoLamz0=; b=mbhrGbmSfdBItKNL8A5fc1aECuHO3G96TDMJZQnhmX+uOSTdsIDS1nug6x4XgZc8Ak a00bKTufRyWtbiB2jvDCdztDA6MHH6z/CHH2rEqTvYlh7gJtC5XywVhWmM4nu2+GjFmc c3ikKGeZ/pL6KJNByjfBTU/1vVM6RaIbknvmdcd0HUrEKr5f+JOPdDlm6WqlRQxfEPp8 7A2t0cHYKlHDVrkJfufPUALj1foBwaT+vqnMHxOhiZw3vke2mIxUzOCog1hYGVEJOSrV 7sh4WcGA8j+WASqcnd0EnpZa8f2Q8WCGtgnStrR2jOSYwH/x8/XM9SiYNAbivdsYLN+h JVnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.48.100 with SMTP id k4mr3429609lbn.95.1411534234989; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.166.75 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.166.75 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACweHNBScqFdW904kMnEnX7Unnz0cwF8aYD0QRnzGT+Zqro0xw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnUMkiGfM1shACLBwbnG8J8UAdL_W_ow4T2BMXfMoHXRGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNBScqFdW904kMnEnX7Unnz0cwF8aYD0QRnzGT+Zqro0xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:50:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXU7+Whwnak+eQ=X93t4smK4MNJwbKm4qvNm5XqsciTBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134808eaa39e10503c86c79"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.217.170; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f170.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.721, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XWeXe-0004gL-5k a93bf253451aa6ae818153d58d920e69
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Frame size errors
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXU7+Whwnak+eQ=X93t4smK4MNJwbKm4qvNm5XqsciTBA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27190
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Sep 24, 2014 12:59 AM, "Matthew Kerwin" <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote: > > On 24 September 2014 02:31, Martin > Just a question on specific word usage: where you have "A ... ​frame of a length other than ..." I'd have used "... frame with a length ...". It hints a bit more strongly that the "length" to which we refer is the field -- which, as was mentioned in a thread a while back, is actually the length of the payload, not the length of the frame per se. I'm ok with that. To be honest, this probably isn't my best work, since I hadn't slept in more than 24 hours when I did that. I'll fix it up, unless you want to give me a PR ;)
- Frame size errors Martin Thomson
- RE: Frame size errors Mike Bishop
- Re: Frame size errors Matthew Kerwin
- Re: Frame size errors Martin Thomson