Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Fri, 27 February 2015 11:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01E71A9175 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:37:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yh7iFh8UnjZS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91821A916C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YRJB5-00023s-QY for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:33:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:33:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YRJB5-00023s-QY@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1YRJAw-000236-Dr for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:33:46 +0000
Received: from 121-99-228-82.static.orcon.net.nz ([121.99.228.82] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1YRJAv-0001n5-Bl for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:33:46 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.8] (121-99-62-60.bng1.tvc.orcon.net.nz [121.99.62.60]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F0AE6FC5 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:33:11 +1300 (NZDT)
Message-ID: <54F055E8.6030207@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:32:56 +1300
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20150227052622.BD23A181B3D@rfc-editor.org> <A815F695-E6DF-416E-992C-899EC4FD9641@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <A815F695-E6DF-416E-992C-899EC4FD9641@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.416, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YRJAv-0001n5-Bl 245296b2a525b0289e1b947fc9d17851
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54F055E8.6030207@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28865
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 27/02/2015 6:36 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think Roy wrote this text, but from my standpoint, it's REJECT -- Content-Length defines message length under these conditions no matter what the UA should or should not do. > > Agreed. It also applies to messages regardless of whether they are request, response, inbound or outbound. Amos
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Willy Tarreau
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Amos Jeffries
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Roy T. Fielding
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (4281) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4281) Demian Brecht