IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header

Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com> Wed, 15 July 2015 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CF21A8766 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_Zfuzi-eVYZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229451A7113 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZFQGc-0006MM-IQ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:14:46 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:14:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZFQGc-0006MM-IQ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <bishillo@gmail.com>) id 1ZFQGZ-0006La-ED for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:14:43 +0000
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <bishillo@gmail.com>) id 1ZFQGX-0006UX-8s for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:14:43 +0000
Received: by ietj16 with SMTP id j16so38399847iet.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=3XQFLAAqNrl3KUXGIl9sVwFVMQd2gr5bsI4jXDngtFQ=; b=FXk+GcmGClbuEq6TBw12zfzTCwSgZzCnCJKs7zUchvXGdDGlfH8lN4vhCuc1NTo7K7 iNYpUQ0zcTFhfKP4f4HQgNr00HEffSoLZcsJIHLaKEEsbRDLnIpge4zvLVWGc+SzTBf3 Re9skc7olqej0BtyP20eSNKaGvYX2REnrPvt/2f7dc9+Xddaz7eQ+AuJWD5nv3ZBkPgg c4LwLDzULNIu2cXMZahlgX1pvX4JMv2jaPaMBYrdBxLYoC8U4KHPnU4CaR8vfB+xsZpq ErwvVhd4jl17/k9pdjYDbzbFiigCdgNyEHljGyOr7Xne7h/xkWJuRXVRMIUKgAz1bS+U ukUg==
X-Received: by 10.107.28.202 with SMTP id c193mr6421427ioc.90.1436980455139; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.142.200 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABgOVa+C48yYp-ZkawY+Ho6pXONa_UfB0MVt_2+d0ejyESu2Pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABgOVaLHBb4zcgvO4NUUmAzUjNkocBGYY3atFA9iuYyoLaLQsA@mail.gmail.com> <559F9E90.4020801@treenet.co.nz> <CABgOVaLG6QZyjqk2AGYupShST_u3ty9BpxUcPX+_yMEC1hyHAQ@mail.gmail.com> <961203FE-7E54-410F-923E-71C04914CD2E@mnot.net> <CABgOVaJxntEyT0v4GvWm0Qi9jbUPEnzxJgg4KyQSM1T_gN1mjQ@mail.gmail.com> <16407353-5C34-42E8-81A6-E0027EC3A0D0@mnot.net> <CABgOVa+C48yYp-ZkawY+Ho6pXONa_UfB0MVt_2+d0ejyESu2Pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:13:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMSE37sqDmSstH7sDVYUgDCRB6hxi3X2b5MH27ORaYXm-aYwLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ff13c93f556051aed1564"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.223.181; envelope-from=bishillo@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f181.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.818, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ZFQGX-0006UX-8s 5757cf176f96020119bab6434c15b159
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAMSE37sqDmSstH7sDVYUgDCRB6hxi3X2b5MH27ORaYXm-aYwLw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29962
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com> wrote:

> static


If corruption is still a concern (not sure if it is because https will give
us better integrity guarantees), what about an optional checksum?
static=<type>:<hash> like static=SHA1:###... ?

That could help preventing corruption for items that are going to stay in
cache forever. It doesn't need to be mandatory neither on origin nor
clients to validate it, but intermediate proxies/browsers can be more sure
that the content they are storing is non-corrupted.

-- 
Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com>
:wq

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email