Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header

Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com> Wed, 15 July 2015 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24D91B2E48 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUaVfhelDeji for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D001B2E46 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZFVLl-00006P-Ue for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:40:25 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:40:25 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZFVLl-00006P-Ue@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ben.maurer@gmail.com>) id 1ZFVLh-00005d-Bn for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:40:21 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ben.maurer@gmail.com>) id 1ZFVLg-0006IA-0V for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:40:20 +0000
Received: by lbbzr7 with SMTP id zr7so33526864lbb.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ECCOCx+RqQi3mg+ZhCyA/3IEZTmxwdDU76aPHbpO3lU=; b=ARCO6cvrz43AELvV+iXMrZj3mkA9IyOsKDbKvLtWc84GVXgo43mP/BHcgkvOk2wpuW oDxroV/IJ2Jty7o5j9GQSXTV4hhlfRAMDG8718UuCOYnaX/S8J5A6IBw4BJDJTTis/LG iuPiGy3dKUtJSU7gc+i21yKPq32m6JrNFzq5ZvuOzV8t/YMi39bjisH5CJR9emrM6tof 32unxG6LS/tLPnmLj6kyQo/WSHNmAwO3Rzw2VzfrEajLtqF39JKcBhSHBdIedY++mdbW wtknEby5Uhk+YJkSsFo19V3Bl9u1AEE+X5Q+a+u/ApwRurk0EDHwbF2tW+R6UW2shX9q 29mw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.19.35 with SMTP id b3mr6356066lae.92.1436999992978; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.163.147 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU0+X4eEMoUtwn=rmU5nOWfTYcQxsFwOKJixN0upFOh3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABgOVaLHBb4zcgvO4NUUmAzUjNkocBGYY3atFA9iuYyoLaLQsA@mail.gmail.com> <559F9E90.4020801@treenet.co.nz> <CABgOVaLG6QZyjqk2AGYupShST_u3ty9BpxUcPX+_yMEC1hyHAQ@mail.gmail.com> <961203FE-7E54-410F-923E-71C04914CD2E@mnot.net> <CABgOVaJxntEyT0v4GvWm0Qi9jbUPEnzxJgg4KyQSM1T_gN1mjQ@mail.gmail.com> <16407353-5C34-42E8-81A6-E0027EC3A0D0@mnot.net> <CABgOVa+C48yYp-ZkawY+Ho6pXONa_UfB0MVt_2+d0ejyESu2Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMSE37sqDmSstH7sDVYUgDCRB6hxi3X2b5MH27ORaYXm-aYwLw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU0+X4eEMoUtwn=rmU5nOWfTYcQxsFwOKJixN0upFOh3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:39:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CABgOVaLZ2V7Na9u5FOOy7kkny8j_qiBLDrnZAOOJ_TBkuVZOpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01493fb21fb3a6051af1a21e"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.217.178; envelope-from=ben.maurer@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.901, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZFVLg-0006IA-0V 7f8fd4116c5f70492cb65521f9be704a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABgOVaLZ2V7Na9u5FOOy7kkny8j_qiBLDrnZAOOJ_TBkuVZOpw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29965
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

SRI is difficult to use in many of these cases. For example, at Facebook,
we often dynamically construct thumbnails of photos in order to avoid
having to store both high-res and low-res versions of a photo. We might
link you to /profilepics/64x64/4.jpg which is a 64x64 version of 4.jpg.
Since this file is computed on the fly, we don't know the hash of the file.
But we'd still like to serve it with a "static" tag so that it can avoid
situations.

-b

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 15 July 2015 at 10:13, Guille -bisho- <bishillo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If corruption is still a concern (not sure if it is because https will
> give
> > us better integrity guarantees), what about an optional checksum?
> > static=<type>:<hash> like static=SHA1:###... ?
>
>
> At that point you are reinventing SRI.  Which suggests that SRI is a
> signal that user agents could use, and might be all that is necessary.
>