IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 10 May 2013 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084E21F8B33 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.190, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BNbPGPpXef08 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BC521F90E0 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UasPo-0007Je-16 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 18:51:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 18:51:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UasPo-0007Je-16@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UasPc-0007Eq-9e for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 18:51:24 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UasPR-0007Ss-5S for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 18:51:24 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m6so942295wiv.9 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lzWQo+/HU7mEqxC/Jg/a4GATfBSUZHKLgMgLbp4LYMs=; b=Lac1tFNep3ri+KYLaBLRY8iCP4xzdtQz/U4jXyf7sJuTSFMzHttuJDi0DozhaNcxi7 MBdDnZEmpLJDL6S6M4VbE7vcEwUe6XAjyhRLNg+wL90fUezI1sv3tkx/+8PXmkDkwkc4 7SYZ4GiMwt2zdT9IRThkodnMs20wcSVMNB0ZIHGBroEPE+wUqtCnuK9U7Y+885vjRV+e oSjanOFA2/P8ok8gKvow3ymYsnZgQBJxNkTvUevWD7ZXC/DczZHWHD/mh+9i4sQD/4yk INLeUCfue5fKd4egSVGofXPo3dnqmP5fF7j0+3S5Nf87o4dWslAFCmyvQCNhWo17YFZK fnkw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.83.199 with SMTP id s7mr5734439wiy.19.1368211846995; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFA1p16FHaSf7b1=mhe_Cb=ZqV1m0HVwkQNdW+pkJ0OkA9L-5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbcfTjN5QFFuGm-P-rQMpAR3FGSC58WCy3qKn+29YCjn+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYiwNSzvrY1LF_Sex_82TSDwMbTvYqo7LyKfBAOu0j4pfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbdqnH0JK-UaMiaR5rLvZo8txywEcXXSUXa_y95hrLC5yA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7Rbd-VfTFYurZ-JEKjHKOeKvZCKoYLGMXf+0mi-_wbdKYqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgfu=rcji-bdxNPsE9KCE4T67+vN9b0iojnvycx5R-StA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX=AemYGrBzWGX1VEUgKKrk+hR6YV0jg9qVMSdPiimBAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFA1p16FHaSf7b1=mhe_Cb=ZqV1m0HVwkQNdW+pkJ0OkA9L-5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWpKqAzQj1NMAF1rWKuzoErHiPKenJUgBvNzpPCx4xfeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>
Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.182; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f182.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.697, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UasPR-0007Ss-5S 95404933966d2dd1413ff126e32c1ee9
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWpKqAzQj1NMAF1rWKuzoErHiPKenJUgBvNzpPCx4xfeA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17925
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 10 May 2013 10:58, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com> wrote:
> While I love the idea of limiting frames to 65535B, I hate the idea of a
> continuation bit.

Yeah, but perhaps you can reserve that hatred for the requests (and
responses) that have so many headers that they are larger than 64K.
Compressed.  :)

Most uses of the protocol wont see a continuation bit in use (which
suggests another problem).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email