Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentication
Eric J Bowman <mellowmutt@zoho.com> Fri, 24 February 2023 23:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D803C14CE44 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:31:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zoho.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YxdvvDN5zBMZ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:31:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4214EC14F744 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:31:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1pVhXO-00BbLU-6b for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:31:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:31:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1pVhXO-00BbLU-6b@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mellowmutt@zoho.com>) id 1pVhXM-00BbKX-FS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:31:37 +0000
Received: from sender4-pp-o90.zoho.com ([136.143.188.90]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mellowmutt@zoho.com>) id 1pVhXL-00D4XK-1y for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:31:36 +0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1677281471; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=gJgSkQMxdf7N+spqz7/MgedWPEFhLTXfjKSaowtYjdTtJks3zpnbHylV4hU7sJsPsPix60nbSE1MxhDFmnCgB+ny4a8nxffIscqRhesPnEJchBQ4cdiRkfyzXwnJoG3vhQrDU+cxT4URY4y5vN7JtRAyHTKqbV5i+qAH14oCZRk=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1677281471; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=wKofeRrDFwiRCxEJJmahzF1zQ5bk9AuacZwIat7mETY=; b=ZVns9YBnOCwDFcMhJRLQ39+Xn0HrUm7v+ecqMq7GVI9gFzjbJ1k2sxMyPNV8/P+LXsZL2GOE8YBm0r8GXqgHzo5JfT7kl3kCNVUnlllN257Q8EsZg7B7OmREkmuYHhxtFQ9TCPbXu2JEXJpOx5shtSIhp2IERp/xXlkW53Yed9Q=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=zoho.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mellowmutt@zoho.com; dmarc=pass header.from=<mellowmutt@zoho.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1677281471; s=zm2022; d=zoho.com; i=mellowmutt@zoho.com; h=Date:Date:From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Message-Id:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Feedback-ID:Reply-To; bh=wKofeRrDFwiRCxEJJmahzF1zQ5bk9AuacZwIat7mETY=; b=LX4KUrXrka19nK5TK3UdpFBnuwM0swOz4TsV3ND1tMiSP+gG/RkDh/w14c+iYv+W 1pSK9C5b4WrCoZCd0pDsT6uwNRtAwjlcPeovP5VMKKiVPPHsGBVuwiSGor9jx+jAeFP 6DJt5OUFOlm64gSWtIhZfZ3fml5Akt60AU6c3yjo=
Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1677281471326123.1736985530639; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [65.117.211.248] by mail.zoho.com with HTTP;Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:31:11 -0800
From: Eric J Bowman <mellowmutt@zoho.com>
To: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Cc: mark nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, http working group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, tommy pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-Id: <18685c42b44.e1acca954877.5894602446250292773@zoho.com>
In-Reply-To: <466C7100-4FB1-407E-A488-5AE553460C4C@heapingbits.net>
References: <6532E43F-74FD-46B4-8D28-9DB03452A689@mnot.net> <466C7100-4FB1-407E-A488-5AE553460C4C@heapingbits.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_12720_1222574198.1677281471300"
Importance: Medium
User-Agent: Zoho Mail
X-Mailer: Zoho Mail
Feedback-ID: rr08011228aba8d8d28529e037f7deef26000010f63287ad30d0712c53be8dfd60fc8a3ac912155557c0f37a90:zu080112274271e8d95eef8ec989ab9f7f000078a866e9ee3a019eb914913dfd74ddd2776bfcb1b72bec2657:rf080112328a5d122a4f9148d17c527ae60000aaa6c8df6eaf126440938537f0ceeb1570a91df988161074d4afc5c5eddbcd336554a540:ZohoMail
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.90; envelope-from=mellowmutt@zoho.com; helo=sender4-pp-o90.zoho.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mellowmutt@zoho.com domain=zoho.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mellowmutt@zoho.com domain=mellowmutt@zoho.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1pVhXL-00D4XK-1y bba6a8d0cf32556683f7a5a2369fd0f3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentication
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/18685c42b44.e1acca954877.5894602446250292773@zoho.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/50749
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
No offense to Chris, but ugh. Cookies have value, but they're still fundamentally at odds with the architectural style derived from reality. The entire notion of unprompted authentication is a red flag to me, architecturally speaking, especially to support a niche use-case. I don't see this as a "super cookie," but I can't put my finger on why it worries me along those lines, as an end-run around how HTTP Auth "should" work, at least in what's left of my brain. Mainstream or niche, to me, any use-case should conform to... well... my notion of "proper" architecture. See "Minority Report" lol, this is pre-crime... -Eric ---- On Tue, 07 Feb 2023 12:41:02 -0800 Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> wrote --- I'm supportive of adopting this draft on the basis of the desired use cases. They may be rather niche -- and should likely be added to the draft [0] -- but I understand them to have value. I do have some questions about the technical contents, which I've filed issues to track [1,2,3,4,5]. I'm happy to help seek resolution of those on GitHub. Are there any implementations of this mechanism yet? I would be happy to help provide an implementation of the server piece for interop tests. Best, Chris [0] https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/22 [1] https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/17 [2] https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/18 [3] https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/19 [4] https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/20 [5] https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/21 > On Feb 7, 2023, at 12:58 AM, Mark Nottingham <mailto:mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > We first discussed this draft at IETF114[1], saw implementation interest at IETF115, [2] and finally had some more list discussion. > > This is a Call for Adoption for: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schinazi-httpbis-unprompted-auth-01.html > > Please indicate (in response to this message) whether you support adoption, and whether you intend to implement. > > The CfA will last for two weeks. > > Cheers, > > > 1. https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf114/minutes.html#transport-auth-david-schinazi > 1. https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf115/minutes.html#unprompted-auth > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
- Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentication Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Martin Thomson
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Christopher Wood
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… David Schinazi
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Martin Thomson
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Eric Kinnear
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… David Schinazi
- Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP Unprompted Authentica… Eric J Bowman