IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for adoption: draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 06 February 2015 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59BF1A1A4A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 02:06:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2PI5vzFrkyD0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 02:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09E81A0145 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 02:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YJfjx-0007Rj-Hz for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:02:21 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:02:21 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YJfjx-0007Rj-Hz@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YJfjo-0007Qt-0I for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:02:12 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1YJfjm-0003ll-H8 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:02:11 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.175] ([93.217.112.94]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGRhs-1YO5Yu0nYm-00DEn7; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:01:28 +0100
Message-ID: <54D490F3.60903@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:01:23 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Yutaka Oiwa <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <1BA93C83-91E9-4E7D-88CE-ADC8C39091C6@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXhg55e5N2O8yZJpTbz4qSm0-KpVApyDha_snetrFqvMw@mail.gmail.com> <54C9E419.1070407@greenbytes.de> <54CB7A4F.7090402@crf.canon.fr> <54CB7F48.4060800@gmx.de> <CAGL6epLUkFi6amhExWASqjS5Mvs1MVTJ1hDmhBTncznQV1GK1A@mail.gmail.com> <54CBFB6E.9070800@treenet.co.nz> <54CF7E9B.2060700@gmx.de> <CAGL6epL_XLY+ZeLPi3XVJsdaoSYFwhJuuy7zDeLspJ0tMfKvKw@mail.gmail.com> <54D24CFC.20709@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <54D24CFC.20709@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:srBayxkU8mqkdD/PMHV+SxHBrId1rHkLNoPTgI6nzvbrpEXvR60 DskA2oQEIvK1PmU1vfGaTlJpF3qcDHIcYPvUoTvvXojs7gsSJV7js6uLBmiZOt/sif0jdag j24inYCC9aMHcgeNFIqiwUVR1NRn2SDqpxR3eBXahYtUJlIbZ49xj8+uVOnEDQdQYlT93wh 9i0M0frqINLX8FrzxqLaA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.395, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1YJfjm-0003ll-H8 e7fdca51156417b0f1cf5f0193277911
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for adoption: draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54D490F3.60903@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28768
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2015-02-04 17:46, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-02-02 15:08, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote:
>> This document does not define any semantics associated with these
>> header, which means that the document that uses these header will be the
>> one that must address the information leak issue.
>> I do not see why we would restrict a future use of these headers based
>> on the Digest usage; this seems odd to me.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Rifaat
>
> Well, the goal for me was not to define anything new, but just to
> extract what we have already into something that can be maintained
> separately from DIGEST. As such, Hervé's comment made sense to me, and I
> updated the editor's copy accordingly:
>
>
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-latest-from-previous.diff.html>
>
>
> Maybe other potential users of Auth-Info (Yutaka & Alexey) could state
> whether having this constraint would affect their ability to use
> Authentication-Info?
>
> Assuming that is not the case, I'd like to declare victory, submit a new
> draft, and ask Mark to start a WGLC...
>
> Best regards, Julian
> ...

Seeing no additional feedback, I went ahead and submitted draft 01.

Best regards, Julian

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status