JFV and Common Structure specifications

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 21 November 2016 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5ACD1293FF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:51:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QD6qRRdbQ3Sy for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6920F127A91 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c8eeP-0004Y5-LM for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:48:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:48:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c8eeP-0004Y5-LM@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1c8eeB-0004RA-4s for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:47:55 +0000
Received: from fallback-out2.mxes.net ([] helo=fallback-in2.mxes.net) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1c8ee5-00084e-5q for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:47:50 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net []) by fallback-in2.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E50E2FDC25 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:39:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC02922E256; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:38:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Message-Id: <3A206EA7-57FB-4913-BC08-445BD2EFA783@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:48 +1100
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=fallback-in2.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.628, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c8ee5-00084e-5q ade4ade8337c1cca572e4edfdc61ec46
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: JFV and Common Structure specifications
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/3A206EA7-57FB-4913-BC08-445BD2EFA783@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32936
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In Seoul, we discussed both of these specs:

Draft minutes:

The feeling in the room was that we should abandon the JFV draft and adopt the structure draft in its place, with the understanding that it better reflected our current thinking in this area.

If you have concerns about this, please bring them up on list ASAP; otherwise we'll proceed.


Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/