Re: Re-Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis)

[Rahul Gupta <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tommy,

I have raised a couple of issues (one issue and one comment actually) in the (http-extensions) repo over the weekend, which I am hoping could be clarified in the present draft itself.

Thanks in advance,

BR/Rahul


On Thursday, January 25th, 2024 at 6:50 AM, Tommy Pauly <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 

> This WGLC technically expired a while ago — the issue that Julian mentioned has since been resolved. My sense is that this work is ready to go, so I’ll be working on the shepherd write up and will send it along to the IESG soon.
> 

> Thanks,
> Tommy
> 

> > On Nov 9, 2023, at 7:46 AM, Julian Reschke [e-mail] wrote:
> > 

> > Am 09.11.2023 um 16:36 schrieb Tommy Pauly:
> > 

> > > Hello,
> > > 

> > > This email starts a second Working Group Last Call for
> > > for draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis. The current version is here:
> > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-04.html
> > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-04.html.
> > > 

> > > We had a previous last call, after which we agreed to incorporate
> > > Display Strings, which is now part of the spec.
> > > 

> > > Please respond to this email to indicate if you think we are ready to
> > > progress the document, along with any further review comments.
> > 

> > Almost, I would say.
> > 

> > There's one open issue
> > (https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/header-structure)
> > which might be simple to address (and which is related to the unichars
> > draft I mentioned in the WG meeting).
> > 

> > Furthermore, in an ideal world, we'd wait for some implementation
> > feedback (I wasn't able to get this into my impl yet, but I'd try before
> > end of ths month).
> > 

> > > This WGLC will last for one week, and end on Friday, November 17.
> > 

> > Best regards, Julian
> 

>